U.S. Government: Single People Should Not Have Sex Until Age 30

November 30th, 2006

Does this apply equally to all the hypocrite, closet gay Republicans and “Christian” man-boy lovers?

Via: USA Today:

The federal government’s “no sex without marriage” message isn’t just for kids anymore.

Now the government is targeting unmarried adults up to age 29 as part of its abstinence-only programs, which include millions of dollars in federal money that will be available to the states under revised federal grant guidelines for 2007.

The government says the change is a clarification. But critics say it’s a clear signal of a more directed policy targeting the sexual behavior of adults.

“They’ve stepped over the line of common sense,” said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth, a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit that supports sex education. “To be preaching abstinence when 90% of people are having sex is in essence to lose touch with reality. It’s an ideological campaign. It has nothing to do with public health.”

6 Responses to “U.S. Government: Single People Should Not Have Sex Until Age 30”

  1. the Raving Loon says:

    no sex till 30. But you can have as many methamphetamine fueled massages from gay prostitutes in the back of the church as you want

  2. Mark says:

    While these fat pink-faced right-wing Protestant fanatics are preaching this stuff, their 12 year old daughters are already giving blow jobs to boys in the junior high school bathrooms… (I’m not making this up, my cousin lives in Long Island, New York and he tells me stories).

    You gotta love the irony 🙂

  3. tsoldrin says:

    It’s a geeks paradise… isn’t that when they make their first million? 😉

    Seriously though, that’s a pretty weak way to throw the eugenics program out there to the public… expect more specific wording in the future. They’ve got to get down to 500 million somehow after all.

  4. mtlouie says:

    Did you ever read, or even post a link to, the article by Ben Tripp on Smirking Chimp entitled ‘Deviant Conservative Males: An Analysis’? I think that sums this little diddy up quite succinctly. Funny and highly readable and right on.

    Thanks for your site, by the way. As you can probably see, I link frequently. You have some of the best financial analysis on the web.

  5. MM says:

    It’s deja vu all over again.

    Skip Orwell’s 1984, time to watch Logan’s Run for the 30th time.

  6. vincent says:

    ok guys, come on; the Foley thing was over in not even three weeks, you have to admit it could have been way worse than this: it could have been about a adult male democrat having “notsex” with a consenting adult female…then it would have been spoonfed to you 24/7 for 1 1/2 years and it would have costed you 45 Mln.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.