Satire: London Bomb ‘Not Scary Enough’, Brown Tells MI5
June 30th, 2007I can’t take this nonsense seriously. A total piss take represents best analysis I’ve seen so far:
Via: The Daily Mash:
PRIME Minister Gordon Brown has dismissed the latest London bomb scare as “feeble” and “unlikely to frighten the public”.
Mr Brown is understood to be disappointed with MI5’s effort, describing it as “half-arsed and transparent”.
A source close to Brown said: “The PM wanted to start things off by scaring the absolute, holy shit out of people.
“A badly driven Merc with a couple of gas bottles in the back does not cut the mustard.
“We asked for Arabic literature on the passenger seat, a map of Whitehall with big red crosses on it and a huge controlled explosion on live television. Someone will be getting their backside felt for this.”
The source added: “We’re trying to introduce ID cards, imprisonment without trial and swingeing restrictions on freedom of speech.
“We wouldn’t be able to force through new parking regulations on the back of this pile of arse.”
Police say they are looking for “a man” in connection with the incident in London’s Haymarket.
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: “Our investigations are currently centred on a man. If you see a man you should react with complete terror and run screaming into the nearest busy shop or pub.”
Expect more of this nonsense in London. I’m glad I don’t live there anymore.
Just the thought of all those cameras watching me on the streets is annoying…
Satire….you sure about that?
Seems real enough for me.
I couldn’t have said it better if I had written the script. Expect more and also in the U.S..
Remember G W’s amnesty bill was shot down and it would have secured the southern border of the U.S. where the terrorist are entering.
Remember this coming week is the 4th of July. So be on the lookout for suspicious people setting off explosives.:0
Surveillance cameras = evil! People should do whatever they want in public spaces without the thtreat of being caught!
Nothing good could EVER come from surveillance of public spaces, right? It’s just bad!! Just like the police.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6253802.stm
stay anti-establishment!
peace,
proud che t-shirt wearer
I was thinking yesterday, when the news broke about the London incidents, that these terrorists always focus on our capital city and leave the regions alone. And then today, hey presto, we have an attack in Glasgow, which the police there are saying is linked to the London non-events. What next, attacks in Cardiff and Belfast?
Prime Minister Brown has come out and repeated yesterday’s mantra: “Security is the first responsibility of a government to its people”. Looks like we’ll just have to surrender yet more freedoms to protect us from these bungling terrorists.
It seems whenever there is deliberation on a terror’ trial of one sort or another, some entirely unrelated ‘terror’ incident always occurs, perhaps designed to influence the jury.
The jury in the current trial of the 6 men accused of involvement with the 21st July 2005 events in London is in retirement, soon to deliver their verdict.
From the BBC Report of 15 January 2007, the original charges against the 6 men were as follows:
1. That, between 1 Jan and 30 July 2005, the men conspired together “and with other persons unknown to murder other persons”
2. That they “maliciously conspired together” to cause “explosions of a nature likely to endanger life or cause serious injury to roperty”
source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6261899.stm
However, this little snippet tucked is tucked away at the end of a BBC report of 12 June 2007:
“A further charge of conspiracy to cause explosions likely to endanger life, previously faced by each man, has now being left off the indictment.”
Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6745205.stm
Now if the ‘conspiracy to cause explosions’ charge has now been dropped, how can the other charge of ‘conspiracy to murder’ still stand?
This appears be a bit of a hitch to the prosecution case which is reliant on the accused being guilty of conspiring to cause explosions, a charge now dropped.
More research is here:
http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh/index.php?showforum=30
Having been in law enforcement what I have seen is all you need to control the entire agency or department is some of the key/top positions and the rest of the officers and agents, like the “good Germans” “follow orders” – – end of story. The biggest fear of 99% of “law enforcement” is losing their job and having to become a security guard somewhere, to avoid this they will do just about anything, and I do mean anything, as long as a “superior” orders it – – I kid you not, ask anyone, preferably over a few stiff drinks, in the “law enforcement” business who has half a brain who is in anyway honest – – they will tell you the same.
So, having thru Bush I (“Poppy”), Nixon (Prescott Bush’s man), Bush II “Sonny”, and Gonzo (“Fredo”)etc. placed “loyal Bushies” in all key positions of the alphabet agencies such as those FBI Supervisors promoted after the gross negligence (intentional?) conduct of blocking certain field investigations that could have prevented 911 (plenty of field agents were screaming to superiors as to “flight school” types etc. and were ignored or shut down) “they” control the entire government including the Federal Judiciary which is full of Scalia Federalist Society sell out types, God help us. This also goes for the mainstream media. The Barry Seal story, the biggest Cocaine smuggler in US history and a CIA agent (sort of like Oswald in his contact with the agency), where the evidence would show Seal, who had started to run his mouth on the Bushes, was basically set up for a professional hit due to a federal judge’s reporting requirements (post a slap on the wrist for bringing in tons of cocaine poison to our streets), that were ridiculous given the facts of Seal’s situation as a “cooperating” witness with information that could get him assassinated, died with “Poppy’s” phone number in his pocket . . . the “investigation” into his murder was a joke as was the whole “Mena” coke importation investigation in Arkansas, home of the Clinton the “new” Bush family buddy . . . the true criminals, with few exceptions federal and state, now run all branches of government and all top positions in “law enforcement” in the USA, they are a connected Mafia with a family structure nationally and internationally . . . look at the heroin and cocaine smuggling originating out of the spooky Venice Airport where Atta “trained” – – – Daniel Hopsicker is the only journalist who has covered this the NYT and WaPo are just totally in the bag – – my understanding is that a major article on Barry Seal was finished and just about ready to be published in the WaPo when a Skull & Bones editor type successfully killed it . . . there is no doubt that “they” are setting up a total fascist totalitarian feudalism state with two types of people, incredibly wealthy and serfs and that it is not far off, and all these “terror” events just allow them to take away more of our human rights – – the real terrorists own the major corporations and run “our” government and control these fringe groups thru the “intelligence” agencies ala “Operation Gladio” – – thank God for divine justice . . . althought it may occur well after we have all been framed, jailed and/or murdered by “loyal Bushies” and their buddies in “government” worldwide . . . regardless, for all their worldly power & wealth I would not want to be Bush I, Bush II, or Cheney et al on the death bed waiting to go to the otherside where their victims await them . . . .
This first incident at the night club was definitely fishy. Who was it that called the police to that “previous” incident? How did they just happen to *notice* “smoke” in the vehicle? If there was anything there, it obviously could not have been smoke after all, since any source of fire would have lit the gas fumes and blown the thing sky high. And if it was “fumes,” think about it – how would they just *happen* to notice *fumes* in a vehicle and just *happen* to decide to open it up and check it out? And would terrorists trying to pull off a plot into which they have put much time and effort be so stupid as to leave gas canisters, etc. *visible* from outside the vehicle? The news report I read was ambiguous on whether or not they were readily visible or the police had to search, but clearly in either case it makes *zero* sense that the police just *happened* to show up and just *happened* to search this vehicle because that just *happened* to notice “vapor” that was somehow so *alarming* that they searched the vehicle. And the big scene they made about it afterwards? Being sure to have all the cameras there as they slowly moved this thing out? WOW. And people believe this nonsense? MI-5 is going to have to grow some brains if they want to keep this stuff up. But what about that Glasgow incident? that’s the one that’s got me scratching my head. maybe some sellout imam with links to MI-5 goaded them into doing that? anybody have any thoughts on that one?