Catherine Austin Fitts: “I believe one of the goals of the swine flu vaccine is depopulation.”

July 22nd, 2009

Via: Solari:

I believe one of the goals of the swine flu vaccine is depopulation. Perhaps it is the goal of a swine flu epidemic as well, whether bio-warfare or hype around a flu season.

So the question for you and me is “what do we do?” Are we going to take a vaccine? Are we going to allow our children to be vaccinated? Will we have a choice? How can we organize to make sure that we do? Is self-quarantine a practical option? How would we prepare for it?

What you believe is your responsibility. The time has come to build time into Summer schedules to research options, discuss them with those you trust and make informed decisions about what you believe and what actions you intend to take under a variety of scenarios.

I don’t have the answers yet. Somehow, I believe we can find them together. And while we do, let’s remember to pray for the love of humanity to be rekindled in each and every heart.

Research Credit: efs

Posted in Kill Off | Top Of Page

2 Responses to “Catherine Austin Fitts: “I believe one of the goals of the swine flu vaccine is depopulation.””

  1. Dennis says:

    I assume any intentional depopulation would focus on the aged and perhaps the very young. The old Spanish flu would not be suitable for this purpose because the strong immune responses of those in between these two groups were what killed them and killing off the young workers/producers/taxpayers would make the fiscal burden of the aged on society even worse. This assumes such an event would be sufficiently controlled with the intention of maintaining continuity of the prevailing social order.

    A harsher option would be to use something like the Spanish flu to kill off a large chunk of the young and let the old and very young die through the fallout from that event or follow-up events. The aim then would be to inititate a social catastrophe with the intention of re-establishing order (a new order?) after the desired result had been achieved.

    If viruses or tweaked variants along the lines of those already known to be effective as depopulators are used the results can be further modified through fiddling with the immune system of the population to be infected through either immunisation or means of weakening the immune system.

    Which got me thinking…What if there were two different sets of vaccinations for two different groups of people? One as a true immunisation, intended for the survival of the recipient, and one to maximise the probability of death.

    Or perhaps the ‘conspiracy’ area of my brain has hypertrophied.

  2. es says:

    Dennis wrote: I assume any intentional depopulation would focus on the aged and perhaps the very young.

    First of all, intentional depopulation is (present tense) focusing on blacks, particularly those in Africa (please note: so called anti-retroviral/anti-HIV drugs are similar to chemotherapy).

    Then: the possibilities are endless. Just an idea: if you inject metals like aluminium into people (standard ingredient of vaccines) you can use electromagnetic radiation to beam up a whole area or schools or hospitals or whatever.

    But more importantly, what will happen to the 500 million that survive. I guess TPTB are thinking along the lines of 1984 by George Orwell

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.