Afghanistan Says Finds 1.8 Billion Barrel Oilfield

August 15th, 2010

Via: Reuters:

Afghanistan said on Sunday it had discovered an oilfield with an estimated 1.8 billion barrels in the north of the war-ravaged country, where U.S. and other foreign forces are trying to tame a Taliban-led insurgency.

The discovery of the basin between northern Balkh and Shiberghan provinces was made after a survey conducted by Afghan and international geologists, said Jawad Omar, a spokesman for the ministry of mines.

Related: Afghan Mineral Deposits Actually Worth $3 Trillion, Not $1 Trillion

4 Responses to “Afghanistan Says Finds 1.8 Billion Barrel Oilfield”

  1. mangrove says:

    OK, I did a little math — checked it twice, but might have gotten it wrong (someone please verify). If I’m right, isn’t this the equivalent of 21 days of oil (world-wide), at today’s production rates of 85 million barrels per day?

    1800000000 (1.8 billion)
    divided by
    85000000 (85 million barrels per day)
    equals
    21 days

  2. anothernut says:

    Another mathematical analysis:
    current price of oil: $75/barrel
    cost to produce (according to this article, http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/05/news/companies/exxon_oil/index.htm, it’s max $25/barrel, but that was 2007, let’s say it’s 30): $30/barrel

    profit: $45/barrel * 1.8 billion barrels = $81,000,000,000.

    (One could argue that there are MUCH bigger costs associated with this oil, since the so-called “war” in Afghanistan is costing hundreds of billions at this point, but that doesn’t affect our friends in big oil, because we the taxpayers ponied up — and continue to pony up — for that.)

    So we’re talking $81 billion worth of yachts, mansions, and private jets. Oh, and of course, lobbyists’ salaries. End of discussion.

  3. MBerger47 says:

    How can anyone search for oil in a war zone???

  4. mangrove says:

    MBerger47, the answer is: It’s not a war zone. It’s an occupation, with a few occupational hazards. What’s a few IEDs and some deaths of the “beloved” troops, when they really are just cannon fodder (or, in this case, expendable human shields for the military-industrial-oil complex’s continued plundering of resources, all in the name of “war”)?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.