Britain: Undercover Police Officers Allowed to Give False Evidence in Court

October 28th, 2011

Via: Telegraph:

Senior police chiefs authorised undercover police officers to give false evidence in court to protect their cover as environmental protesters, it was claimed last night.

The claims led to Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary delaying a report into undercover police tactics at the last minute.

It had been due to be published today and was thought to be critical of the police.

Lawyers for a convicted protester claim a Metropolitan Police officer called Jim Boyling, posing as an activist, was prosecuted alongside their client and lied under oath to conceal his true identity.

Solicitors from the law firm Bindmans claim Boyling pretended to be Jim Sutton between 1995 and 2000 and joined the non-violent organisation Reclaim the Streets, the Guardian newspaper reported.

As part of his role, Bindmans claim, he was prosecuted at Horseferry Road magistrates court in London in 1997 for disorderly behaviour in a three-day trial.

He maintained his fiction during the entire prosecution, they allege, giving a false name and occupation and lying under oath.

One Response to “Britain: Undercover Police Officers Allowed to Give False Evidence in Court”

  1. pessimistic optimist says:

    last nail in the coffin for lady justice.

    and people think its bad now, just wait and see.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.