What Really Happened to Strauss-Kahn?

November 27th, 2011

Via: The New York Review of Books:

The man I asked to talk to—and to whom I was not put through—was René-Georges Querry, Sheehan’s ultimate superior at Accor and a well-connected former chief of the French anti-gang brigades, who was now head of security for the Accor Group. Before joining Accor Group in 2003, he had worked closely in the police with Ange Mancini, who is now coordinator for intelligence for President Sarkozy. Querry, at the time that Sheehan was making his call to the 646 number, was arriving at a soccer match in Paris where he would be seated in the box of President Sarkozy. Querry denies receiving any information about the unfolding drama at the Sofitel until after DSK was taken into custody about four hours later.

At 1:28, Sheehan, still on the way to the hotel, sent a text message to Yearwood. And then another text message to an unidentified recipient at 1:30. At 1:31—one hour after Diallo had first told a supervisor that she had been assaulted by the client in the presidential suite—Adrian Branch placed a 911 call to the police. Less than two minutes later, the footage from the two surveillance cameras shows Yearwood and an unidentified man walking from the security office to an adjacent area. This is the same unidentified man who had accompanied Diallo to the security office at 12:52 PM. There, the two men high-five each other, clap their hands, and do what looks like an extraordinary dance of celebration that lasts for three minutes.

It is unclear if the police officially took over the case at this time or later. There is so far no explanation for why the security staff had delayed the call to the NYPD that would lead a scandal involving the possible future president of France. What is clear is that they did so just three minutes after receiving a message from Sheehan. Nor is it clear why the two men were celebrating.

When asked why she had not used her pass key to go into another room, she said they all had “Do Not Disturb” signs on the door. After her grand jury testimony, prosecutors discovered that this was false when the hotel belatedly provided them with the electronic key records showing that Diallo had entered room 2820 at 12:26 PM, after her encounter with DSK. The same record also showed that she had also entered room 2820 prior to her encounter with DSK at a time when the occupant had not checked out and may have been in the room. Why she concealed visiting 2820 was “inexplicable” to the prosecutors, who noted in their motion for dismissal that if she had mentioned her visits to 2820, it would have been declared part of the crime scene and searched by the police. But she did not do so.

Nor were DSK’s lawyers able to find an explanation. When they attempted to learn the identity of the occupant of 2820, Sofitel refused to release it on grounds of privacy. Given Diallo’s conflicting accounts, all that we really know about what happened in the nearby room 2820 is that Diallo went there both before and after her encounter with DSK and then omitted the latter visit from her sworn testimony to the grand jury. We still do not know if there was anyone in 2820 when she entered it again following the encounter with DSK or if, prior to the police arriving, anyone influenced her to omit mention of room 2820.

4 Responses to “What Really Happened to Strauss-Kahn?”

  1. Dennis says:

    Just to clarify things a little further:

    Sofitel, the luxury hotel chain, is owned by Accor Group, a French company.

  2. anothershamus says:

    I don’t remember hearing about DSK much before his little problem, however, I am hearing about his replacement ALL THE TIME now!? She seemed to be in all the news headlines for the last 4 months.

    Is Christine Lagarde a shill, taking over the IMF like the new leaders of Italy and Greece doing what the IMF wants, or was it just a local ploy to get DSK out of the French political scene? Or both?

  3. anothershamus says:

    this from global research and Portland indymedia.org via of goats and men.

    DSK appears to have backed a non dollar based economy. One good reason to get rid of him.

    http://ofgoatsandmen.blogspot.com/2011/12/was-dominique-strauss-kahn-trying-to.html

  4. anothershamus says:

    this from global research and Portland indymedia.org via of goats and men.

    DSK appears to have backed a non dollar based economy. One good reason to get rid of him.

    http://ofgoatsandmen.blogspot.com/2011/12/was-dominique-strauss-kahn-trying-to.html

    on edit: this last paragraph is the kicker:

    “We are watching unfold a financial war of unprecedented scale; whereas the economic situation of the United States is unstable and the dollar could quickly become a worthless currency, the agreement concluded at the G8 and endorsed by the G20, implemented by the IMF in coordination with the World Bank and the international banking milieu whose champion was DSK, is now suspended. The domination of the dollar is intact though more than ever artificial; this dollar that the emerging nations wanted to marginalize, but upon which the US-Israeli military-industrial complex bases its power.
    In that context, what is one man’s honor worth ? “

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.