Large Releases of Chaff Over Several States Seen on Radar

January 16th, 2019

Saturation chaff?

Motors feed chaff from rolls of about 40 pounds through cutters carried on some aircraft to produce either bursts or a continuous stream. The continuous stream technique, called saturation chaff, may be used by aircraft to cover a large area. By 2005 or 2006, the Army also planned to use saturation chaff to mask vehicle and troop movements. Using a cutter, 360 pounds of chaff from nine 40-pound rolls can be deployed in 10 minutes. Depending on the method and the number of aircraft, such releases could disperse billions of fibers. The B-52 can carry about 750 seven-ounce boxes of chaff; each box contains up to 11 million fibers that can be expelled continuously or in bursts.

Via: WarZone:

Two days after a huge cloud of chaff lit up weather radar covering portions Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky, as well as social media, more plumes have now appeared over Maine and Florida. We have no official confirmation as of yet, but the formations look very similar in composition to the one that developed in the Midwest.

The first reports of the apparent chaff plumes in Maine began to appear on social media around 5:30 PM EST on Dec. 12, 2018. Early on, four distinct clouds were visible, but these had blended together into a larger blob with a peak length of more than 100 miles by 7:45 PM. The huge cloud was moving southwest and looked like it could easily drift into New Hampshire and beyond.

Posted in [???], War | Top Of Page

5 Responses to “Large Releases of Chaff Over Several States Seen on Radar”

  1. dale says:

    So the chaff is written off as military training. Seems excessive, and no doubt why posted here. Also seems like a bad time and place for mere practice.

  2. Kevin says:

    I wasn’t prepared to say that it’s not chaff, but I very seriously doubt the chaff explanation. Also, I have no idea what the real explanation might be.

  3. Dennis says:

    Testing of reflective aerosols for geo-engineering purposes?

  4. Kevin says:

    Perhaps, but this would have to be something different than what they’ve been spraying for last 20 years, as your “normal” chemtrails don’t show radar returns like what we see in this case.

  5. rotger says:

    Wasn’t the same kind of “finger” seen just before Katrina hit New Orland? At the time, some people were wondering if they were responsable for steering the huriccane at the worst possible spot.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.