9/11 Bombshell: CNBC Anchor Says Building 7 a ‘Controlled Implosion’
September 25th, 2019Via: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
On the 18th anniversary of 9/11, CNBC senior analyst and former anchor Ron Insana went on Bernie and Sid In the Morning on New York’s 77 WABC Radio to share his haunting experience of that horrible day.
Approximately eight minutes into the interview, Insana made a statement regarding the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — which collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11 — that is truly stunning, especially considering his access to the scene and his job as a prominent news anchor:
“Well, remember 7 World Trade had not yet come down. And so when I went down to the [New York Stock] Exchange that Wednesday morning [September 12], I was standing with some military and police officers, and we were looking over in that direction. And if it had come down in the way in which it was tilting, it would have wiped out everything from where it stood to Trinity Church to the Exchange to, effectively, you know, the mouth of the Hudson. And so there were still fears that if that building had fallen sideways, you were going to wipe out a good part of Lower Manhattan. So they did manage for one to take that down in a controlled implosion later on. And the Exchange was up and running the following Monday.”
How is it possible to be that off-message? The PSYOPs value of Building 7 has never been clear to me, especially since no-one remembers it. It’s the weakest link in the chain of the 9/11 narrative and it serves no purpose. And now this?
I could attempt a 4D-chess explanation but I think he just lost the plot. Discipline among our overlords has collapsed.
Or, I suppose, the Alaska Fairbanks study touched a nerve, and it’s time for a limited hangout
Fire did not cause World Trade Center Building 7 collapse, UAF study suggests September 6th 2019,