Ron Paul: The Coronavirus Hoax
March 16th, 2020Via: Ron Paul:
People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “pandemic” could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic.
That is not to say the disease is harmless. Without question people will die from coronavirus. Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure. But we have seen this movie before. Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms. When the “threat” is over, however, they never give us our freedoms back.
Related:
Coronavirus: Italy Locked Down
Posted in [???], Biotechnology, Dictatorship, Economy, Elite, False Flag Operations, Fraud, Health, Social Engineering | Top Of Page
Great catch. Not many high profile people have the cajones to see that this “pandemic” has no clothes, much less to speak out about it. And yeah, Fauci gets the award for chief fearmonger. Same criminals behind all the previous virus lies and hoaxes. But now they’re telling the truth? Right.
Jon Rappoport posted this today. Not that truth matters any longer. This global economy is going down, all to be blamed on this “virus” — a convenient scape-goat with multiple agendas attached, none of which benefits anybody except the controlling oligarchy.
Corona Bologna Italy: The Truth begins to leak out
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/17/corona-bologna-the-truth-begins-to-leak-out/
The government of Italy, as everyone knows, has locked down the whole country of 60 million people. So how many Italians have died from COV? Even by the standards of the useless and misleading diagnostic tests?
Ready?
As far as the Italian Higher Institute of Health knows, at this point:
Maybe two.
Maybe.
Good article, except for the title – diversion, false flag, sure, but not hoax.
I’m being to think this is working exactly as designed. Manmade, r-naught above six, potentially more disruptive than lethal (we’ll see soon enough). Financial collapse (or phase transition) in progress.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
Article published today in Nature Medicine
SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans; SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe disease, whereas HKU1, NL63, OC43 and 229E are associated with mild symptoms6. Here we review what can be deduced about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 from comparative analysis of genomic data. We offer a perspective on the notable features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and discuss scenarios by which they could have arisen. Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.
Theories of SARS-CoV-2 origins:
It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted7,11. Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used19. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone20. Instead, we propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer. We also discuss whether selection during passage could have given rise to SARS-CoV-2.
One more for the financial event hoax theory:
https://www.thechicagoeconomist.com/episodes/the-sport-of-speculation
Debunking “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab
https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/03/19/china-owns-nature-magazines-ass-debunking-the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2-claiming-covid-19-wasnt-from-a-lab/