Boston University Creates COVID Strain With 80% Mortality In Mice
October 17th, 2022Dollars to doughnuts, when one of the chimeric strains they invent escapes the lab and slips into the general population, the same Boston University researchers credited on the paper will land brand-new jobs engineering “therapeutics” to combat the virus they unleashed.
Instead of being punished for their evil recklessness, they’ll be handsomely rewarded. The corporate media will laud them as heroes once their new drugs get put on the market, and liberal mothers will flock to the nearest Walgreen’s© facility to inject their children with them.
—
If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.
Via: ZeroHedge:
Researchers at Boston University have created a new strain of Covid-19 that has an 80% kill rate in humanized mice.
In an effort to research what makes Omicron so transmissible – and funded in part by grants from the NIH and Anthony Fauci’s NIAID, the researchers cobbled the Omicron spike protein to the original strain of Covid-19. The resulting virus was five times more infectious than Omicron.
“The Omicron spike (S) protein, with an unusually large number of mutations, is considered the major driver of these phenotypes. We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant,” reads the pre-print.
>> I knew before looking up this paper that it would be from the Biorxiv.org website for ‘preprints’ which are non-peer-reviewed studies from PR departments being drip fed to us through the MSM to keep the narrative of a scary virus going.
The elites do not care about letting a few scientists take the blame for allegedly doing dodgy experiments and releasing pathogenic viruses into the world, as long as the fear of escaped, bioengineered, mutant, highly pathogenic viruses is maintained. These papers are pure propaganda. It is not helpful to keep drawing attention to them.
I also did not have to look up the paper to know how it was designed to show what they wanted;
‘Twelve to twenty weeks old male and female K18-hACE2 mice were inoculated intranasally with PFU of SARS-CoV-2 in 50 ?l of sterile 1X PBS. The inoculations were performed under 1-3% isoflurane anaesthesia.’
They used a toxic procedure to inject large amounts of fluid directly into the tracheas of tiny mice. The fluids contained abnormal cells in culture to which samples from people with varying degrees of symptoms, mitogens, oxidising agents and strong antibiotics had been added. THEY DID NOT DO ANY CONTROLS for animals treated, stressed and traumatised in exactly the same way using ‘uninfected’ cell cultures with samples from sick people without the virus. […]
The mice DID NOT DIE, they were euthanised after subjective assessment of the well-known symptoms of Covid; weight loss, ruffled fur, hunched posture, unresponsiveness, rapid breathing and shaking.
Detecting the RNA fragments, never shown to come from a virus, in the lungs of these mice after they have been directly injected into them DOES NOT SHOW INFECTION.
Cytopathic effects (CPE) do not show viral activity. They are produced by the culture itself, which would be shown if adequate controls were done.
THE EXPERIMENTS AND PATHOLOGISTS WERE NOT BLINDED. Analysis of symptoms and histological features is very subjective. Which is why such extraordinary lengths must be gone to double blind all experiments. All the symptoms and histological observations can also be explained by the trauma of the experiment. THERE WERE NO CONTROLS. <<
https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-articles-are-not-published