Weinstein on Trump and Disastrous Covid Shots Still Being Given to Children: “There’s No Way Forward by Reaching President Trump, He Can’t Hear It”
May 7th, 2025President Pfizer Warpspeed Pope Trump Gaza Number 1!
Clip:
Weinstein on Trump and Disastrous Covid Shots Still Being Given to Children: "There's No Way Forward by Reaching President Trump, He Can't Hear It" pic.twitter.com/UsNh22lJQa
— cryptogon (@cryptogon) May 8, 2025
Via: Tucker Carlson:
A thoroughly civil debate with Bret Weinstein over the existence of God.
(0:00) Introduction
(1:18) Debating Evolution
(10:54) Is Human Sacrifice Evidence of Something Supernatural?
(19:33) Consciousness vs. Intuition
(28:02) How Does Weinstein Explain the Creation of All… pic.twitter.com/Nr2qkhxNck— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) May 7, 2025
Our great challenge is that the people behind giving our children the poison death shot, along with so many other crimes against humanity like the genocide happening in Gaza,
US Senator Chris Van Hollen:
x.com/ChrisVanHollen/status/1920155262624661907
need to blow up the World in order to get out from under all those crimes.
Just as we were taught back in the day, crime is a slippery, one-way slope. What would the world be like if “everybody’s doing it”? Just look around. While you still can. I hope people are listening to the few politicians we have who are speaking up.
Weinstein is a smart guy but a slippery character. His debate contained so many logical errors that it wasn’t a debate but an artful dodge of most of Tucker’s questions.
His proofs by example are themselves glaring examples of the dodge. If something is true, an explanation of the evidence will suffice. A comparison with an apparently similar situation will not help if the two are not really the same in all the significant ways. Leaving out the dissimilarities is dishonest. Weinstein uses this trick repeatedly to convince his listeners he’s right rather than to prove it.
Like the people he criticizes who have learned so much with technology that they think they are gods, his ego gets in his way. The glib college professor uses his considerable linguistic skills to dance around the layman’s metaphysical questions but does not and apparently cannot answer them.
I think he’s right about biology and experience controlling behavior. But that’s no revelation: the theory is already generally accepted. And it says nothing about the kinds of experience called supernatural that Tucker mentions.
Tucker’s assertion in the beginning that, if evolution is real, then God created it, can’t be proven or disproven because the existence of God can’t be proven or disproven to everyone’s satisfaction in the evidential terms we’ve always used. But Weinstein, who must know that, doesn’t say it and examine it; he deflects our attention to descriptions of the evolutionary process itself.
I’d say it’s pretty God-like for the world to be set up so you can’t scientifically prove He’s there but, as He prefers, you just have to believe in Him.
More and more, information is being considered as something as real and essential to the fabric of this universe as mass, energy, space & time, perhaps more so. A famous physicist summed things up as ‘It from bit’, which is as succinct a summary of the opening verses of John’s Gospel as you could get.
Some might say Christianity’s extrapolation of Jewish theology can be thought of as the fusion of monotheism and Greek philosophy.