Interview with Epstein Victim Juliette Bryant: Six People Wearing Hazmat Suits
July 15th, 2025What was actually happening at Jeffrey Epstein’s New Mexico property?
Just months before Covid unfolded, we learned: Jeffrey Epstein Dreamed of ‘Improving’ Humanity With a Baby-Making Ranch (and His DNA):
Accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein toyed with an unorthodox plan for shaping the future of the human race: He imagined impregnating as many as 20 women at a time at his New Mexico ranch, distributing his DNA for the betterment of our species, The New York Times reported today (July 31).
Reflecting back on Covid, it’s a fascinating coincidence that Epstein associate, Donald Warp Speed Trump, was President during this period.
One degree of separation from Jeffrey Epstein:
It’s also a fascinating coincidence that Bill Gates (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) participated in Event 201 and spent billions of dollars on the development, promotion and distribution of Covid 19 vaccines. The operation that resulted in billions of people receiving these vaccines is easily one of the most egregious medical frauds in history.
One degree of separation from Jeffrey Epstein:
And now…
One of Epstein’s victims, Juliette Bryant, describes how, during a visit to Epstein’s New Mexico ranch, she awoke, naked and unable to move, in some sort of laboratory surrounded by six people wearing hazmat suits…
The core truth of whatever the Epstein operation was actually about was never going to come out. That was very clear over a decade ago.
I’m at a point where everything I think I know about Epstein amounts to a limited hangout narrative. Crooks blackmailed other crooks. Mmm hmm. Tell me something I don’t know.
But as even mainstream media is talking about CIA and Mossad running Epstein and it all amounting to a basic honeypot operation…
Who were the people in the moon suits in Epstein’s lab and what were they doing to Juliette Bryant?
Via: Blaire White:

Remember the movie, “Rosemary’s Baby”?
The level of depravity and malign influence swirling about the Epstein nexus for the last 40 years almost seems like it has to be in a parallel universe, if there was such a thing.
I’m wondering how many here have read Whitney Webb’s opus two volume book, One Nation Under Blackmail, detailing Epstein’s role and dealings in the World’s power structure? Even though I’ve had the set since it was published, I’ve only managed to jump around and read half of it–the information is so dense, and the mind repelled. I did manage to get through Professor Antony Sutton’s 1975 trilogy recently–Wall Street & the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and FDR, Wall Street and the rise of Hitler–highly recommended.
I’ve listened to it on audiobook. My 17 year old son read it. He’s able to consume huge books quickly, but even he struggled due to the massive cast of characters over so many years. It’s a lot. No doubt about it.
My suggestion to others would be to use it as an encyclopedia.
My guess is that if Danny Casolaro had not been murdered, he would have written something like Webb’s two volume set. Webb benefits from additional passing decades of the same cabal becoming increasingly emboldened and leaving more breadcrumbs than Casolaro would have had access to.
Yeah, some of the (almost) unsung heroes of the past…
Having a teenager willing and able to take that on–man, that’s outstanding.
Also remember Michael Hastings, whose brand-new Mercedes or BMW crashed into a tree in CA in 2013 and burned up in the middle of the night, supposedly with him driving it? He’d told people he was about to finish a stunning story for Rolling Stone and was taking steps not to get kidnapped by the subjects of the story. Govt seized ‘his’ body from the wreck, said they took it to VT for a lab to examine and didn’t release his actual body to his family for 2+ weeks. Of course it was severely burned, no signs of interrogation reported among the signs of a high-speed car crash. No story was ever published. The whole thing quickly disappeared from the media.
Whitney Webb “One Nation Under Blackmail” vols 1&2 are very good; thorough; useful as a jumping-off point into the many tentacles of references. Also very worrying if even part of the connections are as she posits.