“A New World Order With European Values”: The Unholy Union of Globalism and Anti-Free Speech Measures
July 26th, 2025Via: Jonathan Turley:
The message was clear. The new world order would be based on European, not American, values. To rally the faithful to the cause, the organizers called upon two of the patron saints of the global elite: Bill and Hillary Clinton. President Clinton was even given an award as “leader of the century.”
The Clintons were clearly in their element. Speaker after speaker denounced Trump and the rise of what they called “autocrats” and “oligarchs.” The irony was crushing. The European Union is based on the oligarchy of a ruling elite. The World Forum even took time to celebrate billionaires from Bill Gates to George Soros for funding “open societies” and greater transnational powers.
The discussions focused on blunting the rise of far-right parties and stemming the flow of “disinformation” that fosters such dissent.
Outside of this rarefied environment, the Orwellian language would border on the humorous: protecting democracy from itself and limiting free speech to foster free speech.
Yet, one aspect of the forum was striking and refreshingly open. This year it became clear why transnational governance gravitates toward greater limits on free speech.
Of course, all of this must be done in the name of democracy and free speech.
There is a coded language that is now in vogue with the anti-free speech community. They never say the word “censorship.” They prefer “content moderation.” They do not call for limiting speech. Instead, they call for limiting “false,” “hateful” or “inciteful” speech.
As for the rise of opposing parties and figures, they are referred to as movements by “low-information voters” misled by disinformation. Of course, it is the government that will decide what are acceptable and unacceptable viewpoints.
So they’re not only saying “New World Order” (like they have been for decades), but now they’re making it clear who the intended rulers are: the European elite. Would love to know what occult calculus they used to arrive at the decision to add this bit of additional clarity now. I would guess that they explicitly use benchmarks measuring progress in the fields of AI and robotic to determine where they are in their quest for godhood.
Oops, typo, “So they’re now…”
The numbers of illegal aliens imported into various countries may be another benchmark. Perhaps acreage owned by China in these countries is one, too, and local birthrate vs. illegals’ birthrate. Maybe even national debt relative to GDP, unemployment rate of locals not immigrants, etc.
If you track these numbers from some past date to now, you can correlate current events with them and see if there seems to be a pattern. Only problem is, the numbers available to the general public are probably fake, so you could be finding meaningless correlations or even correlations that were set up to be found.
So first, you’d have to identify which of their AI held the actual numbers and hack into it without being detected…
I have wondered if, at some point, these interconnected AI, which I assume are designed to cooperate with each other, will start competing instead and trying to manipulate each other with fake info, just as the humans who built them do to each other. But that’s a different topic.