cryptogon.com

The audit was commissioned by federal District Judge David O. Carter and completed by Alvarez & Marsal Public Sector Services (A&M).

The report noted that A&M found it challenging to completely quantify how Los Angeles officials spent approximately $2.3 billion in funding meant to shelter, feed, and serve homeless people because of the incomplete and inaccurate manner the city’s homelessness program recorded and collected data.

The report painted a grim picture of the homeless program managed by Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), which was established in 1993.

In a speech to the Polish parliament, Tusk said the government aimed to give full details in the coming months.

Efforts are being made to “prepare large-scale military training for every adult male in Poland,” he told the Sejm.

Melbourne-based Cortical Labs launched the CL1 at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this week, describing it as a “body in a box” that holds the potential to revolutionise AI and robotics.

The computer uses lab-grown neurons that grow across a silicon chip, which allows them to send and receive electrical impulses.

This setup is then integrated into Cortical Labs’s Biological Intelligence Operating System (biOS), through which users can deploy code through the neurons and perform computing tasks.

**Page 1**

**Headline: Unveiling “Dark MAGA”: Technocracy, Gov-Corp, and the New World Order**

The article argues that Elon Musk’s declaration of being “dark MAGA” signifies a deeper agenda than simply supporting Donald Trump. It posits that Musk, along with other technocrats like Peter Thiel, are pushing for a “Technate,” a system of governance driven by technology and experts, potentially leading to a totalitarian “gov-corp” structure within a multipolar world order.

**Musk’s “Dark MAGA” and Technocratic Roots:**

* The article dismisses explanations of “dark MAGA” as merely a meme coin or violent fascist takeover. Instead, it asserts that it refers to the “Dark Enlightenment” and Technocracy.
* Musk’s self-designation as “TechnoKing” of Tesla, along with CFO Zach Kirkhorn, is highlighted as a deliberate act, signifying the importance of Technocracy to Musk.
* The author emphasizes that seemingly offhand remarks by oligarchs like Musk and Thiel are often Aesopian language indicative of core beliefs.
* The article places Musk and Thiel within a “superclass” (or “parasite class”) of influential oligarchs who shape global events, noting they are supported by even more powerful figures behind the scenes.

**Family History & Ideological Inheritance:**

* The article traces Musk’s interest in Technocracy back to his maternal grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, who led the Regina branch of Technocracy Incorporated in the 1930s.
* Haldeman was arrested for violating Canadian regulations and deemed Technocracy Inc. an “illegal organization” due to his views.
* Haldeman’s later involvement with the Social Credit Party, advocating for a “National Credit Office” and “debt-free” credit, is presented as a precursor to Universal Basic Income (UBI), a concept Musk also supports.
* The author highlights that Musk was familiar with his grandfather’s political philosophy from a young age, influencing his own views.

**Technocracy in Action: DOGE and the Centralization of Power:**

* The article analyzes Musk’s role in the newly established US Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), chaired by Musk, as a vehicle for implementing Technocracy.
* The stated goal of DOGE – restructuring the federal government for efficiency – aligns with the principles of Taylorism, a foundation of Technocracy.
* The author draws parallels between DOGE’s ambitions and the “Retire All Government Employees” (RAGE) concept, indicating a desire to dismantle existing governmental structures.
* The placement of DOGE within the White House and its influence on policy through a subcommittee led by Marjorie Taylor Greene are seen as signs of a power shift from elected officials to technical “experts.”

**Page 2**

**The Broader Implications of Technocracy:**

* The article emphasizes that Technocracy goes beyond mere technocratic governance, where experts advise politicians.
* It describes Technocracy as a belief system that posits technological solutions for all social, economic, and political problems.
* The author quotes the mission statement of the Founders Fund, co-founded by Peter Thiel, highlighting the belief that technology is the primary driver of growth and the “shortest route to social value.”

**Technocracy vs. Other Ideologies:**

* The piece argues that Technocracy is distinct from other ideologies, representing a unique approach to societal organization.
* The Technocrat magazine described it as The science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to provide security and abundance to all the citizens of the area involved.”

**The Dark Side of Technocracy:**

* The author warns that Technocracy has “deep, dark, humanity-mutating, society-altering intentions and aims.”
* The 2020-2023 “pseudopandemic” is cited as an example of technocratic governance, where medical “experts” like Anthony Fauci dictated policies with widespread consequences.
* The article suggests that the true aims of Technocracy extend beyond public health measures, encompassing control and manipulation of the masses.

**Conflicts of Interest and the Erosion of Democracy:**

* The article criticizes the conflicts of interest inherent in the DOGE project, where individuals like Musk and Bezos, who benefit from government contracts, are empowered to restructure federal agencies.
* The author questions the ability of elected officials to understand and counter the motives of those driving the DOGE concept.

**Conclusion:**

The article concludes that “dark MAGA,” as embodied by Elon Musk and his allies, represents a push towards a Technate – a system of governance controlled by technocrats and technology. This shift, according to the author, poses a threat to democracy and could lead to a totalitarian “gov-corp” structure. The piece urges readers to understand the full implications of Technocracy and resist its implementation.

Trump will reportedly use his executive powers to direct Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Education Department” based on “the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law,” according to the Wall Street Journal, which viewed the drafted order.

“The experiment of controlling American education through Federal programs and dollars–and the unaccountable bureaucrats those programs and dollars support–has failed our children, our teachers, and our families,” the draft order, which was labeled as “pre-decisional,” reads.