MERRILL LYNCH DUMPING CDOs ONCE WORTH $30.6 BILLION FOR 22 CENTS ON THE DOLLAR
July 29th, 2008It looks like the race is on to try to mark this crap down to the point where some hedge fund buys it for pennies on the dollar.
This race started when National Australia Bank bank tapped the mat and wrote off 90% of its U.S. AAA rated debt.
When that happened, all the firms must have known that the game was up.
Events could move very quickly now.
Via: Reuters:
Merrill Lynch & Co said on Monday it will take a $5.7 billion third-quarter write-down as it unloads huge amounts of risky debt, and will raise $8.5 billion by selling new stock.
The Wall Street investment bank and brokerage announced its plans less than two weeks after posting a $4.9 billion second- quarter loss, hit by $9 billion of write-downs in that period.
In a sign of how toxic Merrill’s debt holdings have become, it has agreed to sell $30.6 billion of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), a kind of repackaged debt, to an affiliate of private equity fund Lone Star Funds, for just $6.7 billion, or about 22 cents on the dollar.
The fire sale nature of that deal will add to concerns that the global credit crisis, which has already led to more than $400 billion of write-downs and losses at major banks, still has a long way to run.
Fierce Fighting Along India-Pakistan Border
July 29th, 2008Why is this border skirmish worth noting? Both belligerents are nuclear powers.
Via: AP:
India said Monday that Pakistani troops crossed into its part of the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir and opened fire. Indian troops returned fire, and at least four soldiers were killed.
Indian army spokesman Brig. Gopala Krishnan Murali called the attack a “brazen violation of cease-fire.”
One Indian soldier died and “three or four” Pakistani soldiers were killed in “retaliatory fire” in the Kupwara area of the region, Murali said.
Murali said that the body of one Pakistani soldier was still lying on the Indian side of the frontier and intermittent firing between troops continued.
There was no immediate comment from Pakistani officials.
The region has been the focus of two of the countries’ three wars, since they were created in the bloody partition of the Indian subcontinent at independence from Britain in 1947, although the frontier had been largely quiet since a truce was declared in late 2003.
But cross-border shootings in the last few months have led to a familiar round of accusations, with each side blaming the other for violating the cease-fire and New Delhi accusing Islamabad of helping Islamic rebels sneak into its part of Kashmir.
Nearly a dozen Islamic rebel groups have been fighting since 1989 for Kashmir’s independence from India or its merger with Pakistan. More than 68,000 people, most of them civilians, have been killed in the conflict, and India routinely accuses Pakistan of assisting the insurgents, a charge Islamabad denies.
Something or Nothing? Heavy Buying of Deep Out of the Money Call Options on Year End Gold
July 29th, 2008WARNING: This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any financial instrument.
The last sentence of this piece should be the first sentence:
“The option market is so black-boxed that you don’t even know why they are doing things.”
So, just in case people get any ideas about running out to buy, sell or hold anything, know that I’m posting this, not because I think it offers any insight into what’s going to happen, but because it will be interesting to watch what happens with these options.
Yes, it’s also a Coincidence that expiration on these is right in line with my long standing guess that the U.S. will experience MAJOR economic and political disruptions in the closing months of 2008.
Just eyeballing it, a $7.30 premium for $1200 strike December calls doesn’t sound like too reckless a bet, actually.
Either the U.S. Dollar Index is going to break below 70.79, or it isn’t. I’m of the opinion that it is going to break through that last and critical support, sooner rather than later. Below 70.79… Yeah, those call options don’t seem like too reckless a bet at all.
Well, that’s my read of the chicken entrails. What does your Magic 9 Ball say on this?
Disclosure Reminder: I’m short the dollar, long gold, and short term short the Dow via puts on DIA, August strike 98s off the top of last week’s sucker rally. (Used the daily stochastic to time the buy of those puts.)
Via: Reuters:
Heavy bets in deep out-of-the-money calls and other bullish plays in the gold options market indicate bullion has a shot at rallying to an all-time peak of $1,200 (600 pounds) an ounce by the end of the year.
Gold has soared furiously — a few years ago the metal was trading at $250 an ounce — as investors poured into the market due to inflation fears, a weakened dollar and market turmoil.
“There are a lot of people who think that by the end of the year we’ll be trading $1,200 to $1,500. They are not very expensive options, so people are buying them,” said John Bilello, COMEX gold options floor trader.
Bilello said that many option investors were currently adjusting positions after gold’s sharp fall but he saw recent strong volume of December $1,000 calls, bull call spreads between $1,200 and $1,300, and the selling of put options — all of which are betting that gold will rise further.
A bull call spread involves buying a lower strike price call and selling a higher strike price call, and profits are maximized when prices rise above the higher strike price.
Option traders saw strong interest in the $1,200 December calls and other higher strike prices because they offered an affordable way for individuals to invest in gold’s upside potential.
In addition, these out-of-the-money call options are priced sharply below those of the near-the-money ones — a sign that the price volatility of gold will likely stay high in the near term.
An option is “out of the money” when the exercise price of a call — which gives the buyer the right but not the obligation to buy gold futures — exceeds the current price of the underlying gold contract.
“Option strategies and option positions do reflect the bullish outlook for the gold market. The general view is that gold does have an upside bias despite the setback in the last couple of days,” said Bill O’Neill, managing partner of New Jersey-based commodity firm LOGIC Advisors.
Gold has lost $40 so far this week due to tumbling oil and a stronger dollar, after moving within striking distance of the $1,000 mark last week.
On Friday, both the U.S. gold futures for August delivery GCQ8 and spot gold traded at $925 an ounce. Gold scaled a record-high $1,030.80 on March 17.
COMEX December $1,200 calls currently have 30,000 lots of open interest, by far the most popular among all the different strike prices. The second-highest was the $1,000 calls with 15,144 lots, followed by the $1,050 calls with 12,637 lots.
George Gero, vice president of RBC Capital Markets Global Futures in New York, said that the gold options market was a bullish signal because investors wanted to be long further out in strike prices.
RISING VOLATILITY
Investing in call spreads substantially reduces costs but also lowers the upside, and the strategy was very popular for gold options investors, said Rob Kurzatkowski, futures analyst with optionsXpress in Chicago.
Kurzatkowski said many small speculative traders who cannot afford the more expensive near-the-money calls or the 100-ounce gold futures could turn to the deep out-of-the-money calls for gold investment.
“They are hoping to catch a bit of a move on their investment. So the higher open interest in strike prices out there … is an affordable way for them to participate in the market,” Kurzatkowski said.
On Friday, a single lot of December $1,200 call option costs $7.30, compared with $56.10 of the on-the-money December $925 call. The difference is due to gold’s high implied volatility, which measures the expected magnitude of gold futures price movement given an option price.
Kurzatkowski said that gold’s current implied volatility was about 36, sharply above the long-term average in the low 20s because of the recent large price swings in the gold market.
However, COMEX option floor trader Jonathan Jossen cautioned that the heavy bets in out-of-the-money calls could just be part of a complex strategy by investors to hedge their downside risk by using covered call writing, which combines a short call and a long future.
“The option market is so black-boxed that you don’t even know why they are doing things,” Jossen said.
FEDERAL BUDGET DEFICIT FOR NEXT YEAR WILL APPROACH $490 BILLION
July 28th, 2008Via: AP:
A Bush administration official said Monday the next administration will inherit a record federal budget deficit for next year that approaches $490 billion.
The official said the deficit was being driven to record levels by the sagging economy and the stimulus payments being made to 130 million households in an effort to keep the country from falling into a deep recession. A deficit approaching $490 billion would easily surpass the record deficit of $413 billion set in 2004.
The administration official spoke on condition of anonymity because the new estimate had not been formally released. Administration officials were scheduled to do that at a news conference later Monday.
White House press secretary Dana Perino had no comment on the $490 billion figure. But she told reporters that the White House and lawmakers acknowledged months ago that they were going to increase the deficit by approving a short-term boost for the slumping economy.
“Both parties recognized that the deficit would increase, and that that was going to be the price that we pay,” Perino said.
The White House had predicted next year’s deficit at $407 billion. Figures for the 2008 budget year ending Sept. 30 may also set a record.
February’s White House estimate predicted the next administration would inherit a $407 billion deficit. That’s expected to rise too, given the continuing weak performance of the economy.
Worried Banks Sharply Reduce Business Loans
July 28th, 2008Via: New York Times:
Banks struggling to recover from multibillion-dollar losses on real estate are curtailing loans to American businesses, depriving even healthy companies of money for expansion and hiring.
Two vital forms of credit used by companies — commercial and industrial loans from banks, and short-term “commercial paper” not backed by collateral — collectively dropped almost 3 percent over the last year, to $3.27 trillion from $3.36 trillion, according to Federal Reserve data. That is the largest annual decline since the credit tightening that began with the last recession, in 2001.
The scarcity of credit has intensified the strains on the economy by withholding capital from many companies, just as joblessness grows and consumers pull back from spending in the face of high gas prices, plummeting home values and mounting debt.
“The second half of the year is shot,” said Michael T. Darda, chief economist at the trading firm MKM Partners in Greenwich, Conn., who was until recently optimistic that the economy would continue expanding. “Access to capital and credit is essential to growth. If that access is restrained or blocked, the economic system takes a hit.”
Companies that rely on credit are now delaying and canceling expansion plans as they struggle to secure finance.
Cryptogon Readers Send Contributions
July 28th, 2008I apologize for being slow to acknowledge these contributions.
Thank you.
Eileen $80
JL $150
EM $7
HR $25
DG $10
Solus $25
SW ¥2,000 (First ever contribution in Japanese Yen!)
RG $20
MW $10
CW $15
MW $20
WK $10
CP $15
ROIQ $25
JC €10
CA $25
Dutch Firm Charged in Oil Price Manipulation Case
July 28th, 2008Mike writes:
Kevin,
I’m surprised that you haven’t done a post about this oil price manipulation case, since you were warning us about this long ago:
U.S. regulators charge Dutch firm with oil-price manipulation
What’s up?
Mike, in a short, this is noise level, insignificant activity. All firms who trade their own accounts do this kind of thing on a daily basis. It’s their “business.” They call it, “proprietary trading technology.” Scalping $1 million… It’s… Nothing. Again, noise level. Note, also, that these guys played both directions, which is to be expected.
This is a case of kill the patsy while letting the real perpetrators walk free. I’m not going to say who the real perpetrators are, but if you’ve been reading Cryptogon for any length of time, I’m sure you can guess. (These are household names. The usual suspects.) Why not name them here?
First, I have no proof. Second, they would sue me. (They read Cryptogon daily.) Look at the Plunge Protection Team (Working Group on Financial Markets). If interfirm collusion is happening on equities, doesn’t it stand to reason that collusion is happening in other markets? Questions, questions. No proof, of course.
For the record, let me state again that I think that high oil prices are related to: tight supplies, the crashing dollar and commodity market manipulation. (In which order, for me, depends on the day of the week. However, you can’t have had a run like oil has had without tight supplies.)
I still believe that commodity market players should be required to either deliver or take delivery of the underlying goods in order to close contracts. I wrote about this concept here (replace the word wheat with oil in this case):
If I buy a wheat contract, I should have to take delivery of the physical wheat on the specified date. If I sell a wheat contract, I should have to deliver the physical wheat on the specified date. I should not be allowed to buy or sell those leveraged contracts without having to take delivery, or deliver, physical goods. I shouldn’t be allowed to close my position without an exchange of goods.
The same firms that I’m afraid to mention here (because they’ll sue me) WILL NEVER allow a situation like I described above to happen.
But how to quiet down all of this talk about manipulation?
Give a few Dutch upstarts a thrashing, let Joe Average see that something is being done to ameliorate the problem—which means that nothing substantive at all is being done—and let the Big Boys get on with the business of making a bad situation worse for us and better for them.
Via: Seattle Times:
Facing congressional criticism that speculators are driving up oil prices, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that it has charged the Dutch company Optiver Holding and its American subsidiary with manipulating the trading of contracts for future delivery of oil and gasoline.
In e-mails and phone conversations released by CFTC, Optiver’s heads of U.S. and global trading talk about how they are able to “bully the market” and use similar references like “whack” or “push” or “move” the futures market.
“Today’s action lets the marketplace know that the (CFTC’s) Division of Enforcement has a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to gamesmanship,” Stephen Obie, the agency’s new acting head of enforcement, said at a news conference announcing the market manipulation charges.
The kind of manipulation being alleged doesn’t appear to be large enough to explain this year’s 80 percent surge in oil prices. In a preliminary report issued earlier this week, a Bush administration interagency task force led by the CFTC said it believes that supply and demand fundamentals remain the best explanation for soaring prices.
But today’s action does provide ammunition to critics who insist that the lack of transparency in oil markets makes possible a wide range of practices that drive up oil prices, which in turn drive up the price motorists pay for gasoline.
The CFTC brought charges against Bastiaan van Kemp, a Dutch national who was chief executive office of Chicago-based Optiver US. It also charged Christopher Dowson, a Briton who was head of trading in Chicago at Optiver and Randal Meijer, who oversaw trading for the main Optiver holding company and all its subsidiaries.
In a series of phone recordings and e-mails obtained by CFTC enforcement officials, the executives weigh how far they can push their attempts to “bang the close” of market trading and still avoid detection by regulators. They then allegedly sought to cover up their scheme once confronted by officials at the New York Mercantile Exchange and later the CFTC, according to the charging document.
In one conversation, Dowson said the cover-up plan amounted to “a fairy (tale) story.”
In another conversation, Dowson and Meijer describe their activities to “bully” the market in the last minutes of trading as “a fun game,” and discuss expanding the scheme to other commodities like sugar, wheat or corn.
In yet another conversation, Dowson confides to Meijer that he is trying to build up positions but stay under the radar screen, noting “I’m also not doing it so dramatically that … we’re talking about it on CNBC (television) or things like this.”
The CFTC alleges that in 19 instances over 11 days during March 2007, Optiver’s global and U.S. operations attempted to manipulate the settlement price during the trading of next-month contracts for future delivery of crude oil, heating oil and New York Harbor gasoline. The three executives charged allegedly made more than $1 million from the illegal trading.
Congress has been critical of the CFTC for not being more active in investigating potential manipulation of oil prices and for not seeking greater staffing. Legislation is now moving in Congress aimed at stopping “speculation” in oil markets, so the timing of the CFTC action raised questions of whether the action was political.
Obie rejected the suggestion. “I categorically deny it,” Obie said. He said that cases are brought when they are ready, not based on politics. “This is not politically motivated.”
Obie called the case — the first brought since the CFTC announced a national oil markets investigation in May — significant, but said the agency could not quantify how much Optiver’s alleged manipulation had driven oil prices.
“This case is important for the public to know that this manipulation has an impact on the market. But at this point we are not at a point to quantify that,” Obie said.
The CFTC complaint involves civil, not criminal, charges. It is up to the Department of Justice to pursue criminal charges, and CFTC officials would not comment on that possibility.
In the charging document, regulators allege that Optiver’s top U.S. and global traders engaged in a practice called “banging the close.” During the trading day, Optiver allegedly built up substantial trading positions and then tried to offset those positions in the final minutes of trading before the daily settlement, or close of trading, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern time.
The CFTC alleges that Optiver would try to unload up to 30 percent of its positions near settlement, and the remainder over the final five minutes of trading, most often the final two minutes of trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange, or Nymex.
Milk It: Fonterra Dairy Exports Rise to Quarter of New Zealand’s National Total
July 28th, 2008WARNING: This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any financial instruments.
If you’re holding NZD, know that the scheme relies heavily on two factors:
1) The price of milk. Milk solids, actually. That’s right. If milk solids tank, watch out.
2) Japanese carry trade investors. High dairy prices are part of the reason why the New Zealand Dollar is an attractive carry trade destination for Japanese retirees; who make next to nothing on their cash savings in Japan. Whether the Japanese realize that they’re rolling the dice on the price of milk, or not, doesn’t matter. It’s the price of milk that’s allowing the New Zealand government to keep the Ponzi scheme (carry trade) going.
The bottom line is that if dairy prices fall, the Japanese will pull their money and, well, “Bob’s your uncle,” as they say down here.
Via: New Zealand Herald:
Dairy giant Fonterra now accounts for a quarter of all national export earnings, the co-operative says.
A Statistics New Zealand report prepared for Fonterra showed the dairying contribution to export revenues for the year to May had risen by more than 3 per cent to 27 per cent, with Fonterra accounting for 25 per cent.
Fonterra is the world’s largest dairy exporter, fifth largest dairy company globally and trades in 140 countries.
Chairman Henry van der Heyden said much of the increase had been driven by record commodity prices.
“If we hadn’t had the drought, which saw our milk production drop by around 4 per cent, the figure could have been even higher,” he said.
World economic growth and demand from emerging markets – along with reduced supply, drought in Australia and biofuel production driving up the costs of feedstock – helped drive up dairy commodity prices.
The ANZ Commodity Price Index for dairy products hit 291.9 in November, having risen for 15 consecutive months from 127.6 in August 2006. The dairy index has since fallen in all but one month to reach 256.7 in June.
In May Fonterra raised an already record forecast payout to dairy farmers to $7.90 per kilogram of milksolids, compared with $4.46 the previous season. Fonterra said this season’s payout would inject about $9 billion into the economy.
The final payout for the the 2007/08 season would be announced in September, while the opening forecast for next season was the highest initial forecast in the co-operative’s history, at $7 per kilogram of milksolids.
“We’re seeing continued investment from farmers and in our processing capacity. That’s a huge boost, particularly for regions like Southland with a lot of new jobs and benefits flowing through,” van der Heyden said.
“It’s great that dairying is able to make such a positive and timely contribution to the New Zealand economy at a time when the broader economy is facing increasing pressure.”
U.S. Senate Nationalizes More Private Banking Losses
July 27th, 2008Did you take out a conservative loan that you could actually afford?
You’re going to be paying for everyone who didn’t; which means that you’re also going to be paying for the crimes of the bankers who made the toxic waste loans available in the first place.
Renters, the same goes for you, too.
What a country!
Via: San Francisco Chronicle:
Congress completed work Saturday on the government’s most sweeping response yet to the nation’s housing crisis, sending to President Bush a bill designed to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, spur home buying and prop up struggling mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The Senate, in a rare weekend session, overwhelmingly approved the measure, 72-13, a reflection of the election-year jitters on Capitol Hill over the troubled economy. Bush has said he will sign the bill, which the House approved 272-152.
“Today, Congress did more than send a bill to the president – we sent a message to American families that help is on the way,” said Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who helped write the legislation.
The measure’s critics attacked it as a bailout of speculators and irresponsible borrowers at potentially huge cost to taxpayers.
“This bill is fraught with too much risk and too little protection to the taxpayer,” said Sen. Christopher Bond, R-Mo., contending it would allow lenders to “dump their worst subprime mortgages” on the Federal Housing Administration.
And Now: Islamist Bombers Target Olympics
July 27th, 2008In other words, anyone in China who even entertains thought crimes against the diabolical Chinese regime will be seen as working with the Islamic terrorists from now on.
I don’t know how much more of a locked down prison camp China can become, but, unfortunately for the Chinese, they’re about to find out.
After all, that Goldstein is a tricky bastard.
Via: Telegraph:
A MILITANT Islamic group has threatened to attack the Beijing Olympics with suicide bombers and biological weapons and has claimed responsibility for a string of fatal bombings and explosions in China over recent weeks.
In a video released by IntelCenter, a terrorism monitoring group, a bearded man identified as “Commander Seyfullah” is seen reading a declaration of jihad against the Olympics and warns athletes and spectators, “especially Muslims”, to stay away.
It was issued by a group calling itself the Turkestan Islamic party. The group may be allied with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement – designated a terrorist organisation by the US, China and several other countries – which seeks independence for the Muslim Uighur people of China’s far west province of Xinjiang, which Uighur separatists call East Turkestan.
“Commander Seyfullah” said the group was responsible for three bombs last week on buses in the city of Kunming, which killed two people, and for two bus bombings on May 21 in Shanghai, which killed three.
The group said it also bombed a plastics factory in southern China and claimed involvement in an attack on police in the city of Wenzhou using explosives on a tractor, both on July 17.
Some of these incidents had been attributed to criminals, local grievances or accidents.
IntelCenter said that in an earlier five-page communiqué the group had promised to unleash suicide bombers against the Olympics and told Muslims that the use of biological weapons would be religiously justified.


