Homeless People Die After Bird Flu Vaccine Trial in Poland

July 4th, 2008

Via: Telegraph:

Three Polish doctors and six nurses are facing criminal prosecution after a number of homeless people died following medical trials for a vaccine to the H5N1 bird-flu virus.

The medical staff, from the northern town of Grudziadz, are being investigated over medical trials on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.

Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be tested with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but, according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.

The director of a Grudziadz homeless centre, Mieczyslaw Waclawski, told a Polish newspaper that last year, 21 people from his centre died, a figure well above the average of about eight.

Although authorities have yet to prove a direct link between the deaths and the activities of the medical staff, Poland’s health minister, Ewa Kopacz, has said that the doctors and nurses involved should not return to their profession.

“It is in the interests of all doctors that those who are responsible for this are punished,” the minister added.

Investigators are also probing the possibility that the medical staff may have also have deceived the pharmaceutical companies that commissioned the trials.

The suspects said that the all those involved knew that the trial involved an anti-H5N1 drug and willingly participated.

The news of the investigation will come as another blow to the reputation of Poland’s beleaguered and poverty-stricken national health service. In 2002, a number of ambulance medics were found guilty of killing their patients for commissions from funeral companies.

Related: U.S. Researchers Trying to Create Pandemic Avian Flu

Research Credit: DrFrost501


June Earnings

July 4th, 2008

In June, Cryptogon and Farmlet earnings came to a total of $1072.76, or about 2.1X the minimum monthly goal of $500.

Thank you to all of the cash contributors, all of which were regular contributors except two who were new.

Most of you don’t notice, but a handful of hardcore supporters make Cryptogon possible. The purpose of these monthly “earnings” posts is to acknowledge the generosity of the supporters, and not to unleash ugly tirades on most of the people reading, so I just deleted the next several paragraphs.

[Ugly tirade deleted.]

Here’s the revised version:

In short, it’s not fair that a few people give so much, while most do absolutely nothing at all to keep a resource going. In case you’re curious, I’d like to see each regular reader contribute the equivalent of US$5 per year. This would result in a yearly income of between $20,000 and $25,000 before taxes. That would vastly improve my family’s financial security as well as ease the burden on the people who have sent hundreds and even thousands of dollars to me to keep going. Instead, in 2007, we made about $14,000, with an unthinkable proportion of that coming from a handful of people.

I’ve been at this long enough to know that most people just can’t see why they should pay (anything) for something that’s accessible for free. This situation, though, is starting to rub me raw and it shouldn’t continue. I’ll be thinking about appropriate remedies.

Moving on… (Phew!)

Thanks to the owners of the following domains for signing up for hosting with BlueHost:

comradesimba.com
kohl-doll.com (via Farmlet)
shaw8.com

Thanks to the Cryptogon readers who are also Nitro-Pak and BullionVault customers.

The number of items purchased on Amazon was sharply lower in June than in previous months. This makes perfect sense, as times get tougher with each passing month. Thank you to everyone who remembered to begin their Amazon sessions via Cryptogon. It all ads up.

Interestingly, about 44% of the commission total in June resulted from the purchase of just two items: A professional Canon camera lens and a top quality pressure cooker/canner.

I’d like to offer a quick bit of unsolicited advice to the person who bought that Canon lens:

I owned the old style Canon EF 80-200 f/2.8 L. I bought it new in 1993. I sold it in 2005, along with the rest of my Canon lenses and gear, to help pay for the farmlet. In fact, I sold pretty much everything I owned of any tangible value, except my books and laptop computer, to help pay for the farmlet.

I don’t even think about the rest of it, but I regret selling that camera gear. I should have kept it.

When I was in photography school in the 1990s, and having doubts about doing photography as a career, lots of people told me something like, “That’s fine, but never sell your glass. You’ll regret it if you do.”

So, to the person with the very discerning taste in lenses, I’d like to gently suggest, “Never sell your glass.” Consider trying to find another way to keep it if you think you need to sell it at some point in the future.

Finally, after more than a year, Financial Web decided to discontinue their generous sponsorship of Cryptogon. I’d like to thank them for their support and wish them the best of luck in the future.


Judge Orders Google to Give YouTube User Data to Viacom

July 4th, 2008

Via: San Francisco Chronicle:

In a wide-reaching ruling that could have serious privacy implications, a U.S. district judge has ruled that the popular Internet video site YouTube must hand over details about what people are watching online.

The decision, handed down by U.S. District Judge Louis L. Stanton on Wednesday, is part of an ongoing $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit that Viacom Inc., the entertainment group that owns Comedy Central, VH1, Nickelodeon, among others, filed last year against Google, which owns YouTube. The suit says YouTube hasn’t done enough to remove copyrighted material and is making money off that material.

Viacom demanded to review all the logging information to prove that copyrighted clips are more popular than amateur videos on the site. The logging data includes how often and how much time users spend watching videos, their login ID information and Internet Protocol addresses, the unique identification assigned to individual computers and devices.

The case, and this ruling, could have wide implications for Internet content and user behavior. The sharing of copyrighted materials online, both in music and video, has become commonplace in recent years, creating tension between copyright holders who believe they should control their material and Internet users who wish to share and manipulate such content in a variety of ways.

Today, Google requested that the judge reconsider the ruling.

“We see no reason why Viacom and the other plaintiffs seek or require such information,” Google said in a letter filed with the court. “Given plaintiffs’ stated reason for seeking information from the logging database … potentially personal identifiable information should be irrelevant.”

Google counsel Catherine Lacavera expanded on that point in an e-mailed statement: “We are disappointed the court granted Viacom’s overreaching demand for viewing history. We will ask Viacom to respect users’ privacy and allow us to anonymize the logs before producing them under the court’s order.”

Viacom officials said that it has not asked for personally identifiable information of any user and that all the data will be handled by its advisers confidentially and used only to prove its case against Google.

“YouTube and Google have put us in this position by continuing to defend their illegal and irresponsible conduct and profiting from copyright infringement,” the company said in a statement.

YouTube is the leading destination for watching video online, accounting for more than 75 percent of all U.S. visits in May, according to a recent Hitwise report. To fulfill the judge’s orders, Google and YouTube will have to hand over 12 terabytes of information, a daunting task.

This week’s ruling could threaten the privacy rights of the hundreds of millions of people who use the site, experts said.

“It’s breaking the user’s trust,” said Jeremiah Owyang, an analyst for Forrester Research. “When users were watching these streaming videos on YouTube, they did not expect that information to be passed along.”

Citing the federal Video Privacy Protection Act, Google argued that “the data should not be disclosed because of the users’ privacy concerns.”

“The court’s order grants Viacom’s request and erroneously ignores the protections of the (act), and threatens to expose deeply private information about what videos are watched by YouTube users,” Kurt Opsahl, senior attorney the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote in a blog posting. “As Congress recognized, your selection of videos to watch is deeply personal and deserves the strongest protection.”

Art Neil, an attorney for New Media Rights, a non-profit consumer group, agreed.

“It’s disturbing because there is a chilling effect for the online content,” Neil said. “When big companies find ways to go after people, they use it beyond what the law allows them to do in terms of enforcing.”

The judge’s ruling could pose concerns for other sites, too.

“If Viacom wins this lawsuit, then there’s going to be others who will step up and ask for this data” from YouTube and other companies – perhaps even Apple and its iTunes store, Owyang said.

Google has maintained that the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a law passed by Congress to encourage Internet development, protects YouTube in the Viacom lawsuit and has allowed people to share ideas by uploading videos.

While the judge said Viacom had a legitimate need for the users’ information, he rejected Viacom’s requests for Google to disclose its search engine source code. Viacom had said it needed that information to show that Google makes more copyrighted videos available to users than amateur clips.


Student Researching Bacteria That Create Ethanol Stabbed 47 Times

July 3rd, 2008

Update: Laptop Computer Stolen from Apartment Six Days Before Murders

Via: Times Online:

One of the two French research students found dead in a burnt-out London flat had been stabbed 196 times, the detective leading the murder investigation said today. His friend had 47 separate injuries.

The deaths of Laurent Bonomo and Gabriel Ferez, both aged 23, came as a massive shock to their families and fellow students at the Polytech in Clermont-Ferrand, central France, where both studied bio-engineering and where Mr Bonomo had recently been student president.

The horrific nature of the attack against them shocked even experienced detectives. “I have never seen injuries inflicted to bodies like this before,” Detective Chief Inspector Mick Duthie told a press conference at Scotland Yard.

Mr Duthie told The Times that the two men had been playing a computer game before the attack in the flat at Sterling Gardens, New Cross, which had been rented by Mr Bonomo.

Bound up by their attacker or attackers, they received multiple stab wounds in the head, neck, back and torso.

Mr Bonomo was stabbed 196 times, Mr Duthie said. Almost 100 of those wounds were inflicted to his back after his death. Mr Ferez was stabbed 47 times.

The two were talented and committed students on a three-month research placement at Imperial College, London, who had impressed colleagues with their maturity. They were enrolled on the university’s research opportunities programme, which allows students who have not yet graduated from their Masters degrees to take part in research.

An Imperial College spokesman said that Mr Bonomo was studying a parasite which can spread from cats to human foetuses. Mr Ferez’s research was into bacteria which create ethanol for use as fuel.


Mexico City Looks for Food Crisis Solution in Families’ Backyards and Roof Terraces

July 3rd, 2008

Via: Financial Times:

Mexico City, one of the world’s most populous and polluted metropolitan areas, is working on its own solution to the rapidly rising cost of food: grow your own.

Led by Marcelo Ebrard, the city’s leftwing mayor, the local governmenthas decided to expand a “backyard agriculture programme” launched last year to encourage the capital’s residents to use all available space to grow crops.

“We want to make people realise that they can use their gardens, yards and roof terraces to grow food,” says Adolfo López Villanueva, the programme’s director. “With the climate we have in Mexico City you can get between two and three harvests a year and that would help families keep costs down.”

The programme was launched last year. But the spiralling cost of food has given new impetus to plans for its expansion and this year officials have decided to increase its scope by at least 50 per cent.

Together with agronomists from a local university, the city’s government gives families technical support and agricultural supplies to get their vegetable gardens going. Among the crops available are carrots, potatoes, onions, tomatoes and chillies.

“We get them to provide the land and the labour and we provide everything else,” said Mr López Villanueva.

A parallel project, the urban agriculture programme, focuses on communities, encouraging them to make communal land available for more ambitious crops such as corn, a Mexican staple, and fruit. Mr López Villanueva said the target was to involve about 200,000 city residents in the medium term.

Both programmes were launched last year in the hope that adding a dose of agriculture could improve the city’s notoriously poor air quality.

But this year’s global surge in commodity and grain prices has added to the interest in the programmes. In the past 12 months alone, food costs have increased by about 8 per cent in Mexico compared with less than 5 per cent for the overall consumer price index.

The jump has hit the poorest hardest because they spend a larger proportion of their total income on food. That is particularly worrying in a country such as Mexico, where the minimum daily wage is $5 a day and almost half the 106m population lives below the poverty line, according to government figures.

Mr Ebrard and his team have begun to see their urban agriculture programmes increasingly as a way of combating soaring food prices rather than just pollution. Mr López Villanueva is so optimistic about their prospects that he even believes that participating families could end up generating a surfeit of agricultural produce, which could give rise to farmer-style markets in the city.

“Backyard agriculture could in time become small commercial enterprises,” he said. “The ultimate goal is to lower prices for the whole city.”

In response, Mexico’s federal government, headed by centre-right President Felipe Calderón, late last month announced a series of measures to try to relieve the pressures. These included additional subsidies for agricultural producers as well as a temporary suspension of import tariffs on maize, wheat, sorghum and dried milk.

Related: Cuba’s Urban Agrarians Flourish

Research Credit: DrFrost501


CIA Operative Fired for Refusing to Suppress or Falsify Reports That Iran Had Suspended Work on Nuclear Weapon

July 3rd, 2008

Via: Washington Post:

A former CIA operative who says he tried to warn the agency about faulty intelligence on Iraqi weapons programs now contends that CIA officials also ignored evidence that Iran had suspended work on a nuclear bomb.

The onetime undercover agent, who has been barred by the CIA from using his real name, filed a motion in federal court late Friday asking the government to declassify legal documents describing what he says was a deliberate suppression of findings on Iran that were contrary to agency views at the time.

The former operative alleged in a 2004 lawsuit that the CIA fired him after he repeatedly clashed with senior managers over his attempts to file reports that challenged the conventional wisdom about weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East. Key details of his claim have not been made public because they describe events the CIA deems secret.

The consensus view on Iran’s nuclear program shifted dramatically last December with the release of a landmark intelligence report that concluded that Iran halted work on nuclear weapons design in 2003. The publication of the National Intelligence Estimate on Iran undermined the CIA’s rationale for censoring the former officer’s lawsuit, said his attorney, Roy Krieger.

“On five occasions he was ordered to either falsify his reporting on WMD in the Near East, or not to file his reports at all,” Krieger said in an interview.

In court documents and in statements by his attorney, the former officer contends that his 22-year CIA career collapsed after he questioned CIA doctrine about the nuclear programs of Iraq and Iran. As a native of the Middle East and a fluent speaker of both Farsi and Arabic, he had been assigned undercover work in the Persian Gulf region, where he successfully recruited an informant with access to sensitive information about Iran’s nuclear program, Krieger said.

The informant provided secret evidence that Tehran had halted its research into designing and building a nuclear weapon. Yet, when the operative sought to file reports on the findings, his attempts were “thwarted by CIA employees,” according to court papers. Later he was told to “remove himself from any further handling” of the informant, the documents say.

In the months after the conflict, the operative became the target of two internal investigations, one of them alleging an improper sexual relationship with a female informant, and the other alleging financial improprieties. Krieger said his client cooperated with investigators in both cases and the allegations of wrongdoing were never substantiated. Krieger contends in court documents that the investigations were a “pretext to discredit.”

Krieger maintains that his client is being further punished by the agency’s decision prohibiting him from fully regaining his identity. “He is not even allowed to attend court hearings about his own case,” Krieger said.

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano declined to comment on the specifics of the case but flatly rejected the allegation that the agency had suppressed reports. “It would be wrong to suggest that agency managers direct their officers to falsify the intelligence they collect or to suppress it for political reasons,” he said. “That’s not our policy. That’s not what we’re about.”


Ron Paul: “Fast-Approaching Events… Will Affect All of Us”

July 3rd, 2008

Via: Campaign for Liberty:

I have, for the past 35 years, expressed my grave concern for the future of America. The course we have taken over the past century has threatened our liberties, security and prosperity. In spite of these long-held concerns, I have days—growing more frequent all the time—when I’m convinced the time is now upon us that some Big Events are about to occur. These fast-approaching events will not go unnoticed. They will affect all of us. They will not be limited to just some areas of our country. The world economy and political system will share in the chaos about to be unleashed.


Buffett: It’s Stagflation

July 3rd, 2008

Via: Bloomberg:

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett says he’s concerned about “stagflation,” or slowing in the U.S. economy while inflation accelerates.

“We’re right in the middle of it right now,” said Buffett, chairman of Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc., in an interview on Bloomberg Television today. “I think the ‘flation’ part will heat up and I think the ‘stag’ part will get worse.”


“The Foreclosure Chart for Los Angeles Is Unfortunately Starting to Look Like a Ski Jump”

July 3rd, 2008

Via: Bloomberg:

New foreclosures almost quadrupled in Los Angeles and doubled in Miami in the second quarter, with as much as $5 billion worth of loans going bad in L.A. alone, the online real estate data company PropertyShark.com reported.

The number of homes scheduled for auction in Los Angeles rose 14,505 compared with 3,797 in the same period a year earlier, PropertyShark said in a report distributed by e-mail. In Miami-Dade County, the number climbed to 2,677 from 1,282.

“The foreclosure chart for Los Angeles is unfortunately starting to look like a ski jump,” Adina Dumitru, a member of PropertyShark’s foreclosure products team, said in the statement.

The percentage of U.S. homes in foreclosure more than doubled since December 2006 to about 2.5 percent this March, according to the Washington-based Mortgage Bankers Association. Defaults among subprime borrowers with poor or limited credit histories are driving the increase, along with the rising number of people unable to make payments on adjustable-rate mortgages that started out with low “teaser” interest rates that increase after two or three years.


Want to Know If Waterboarding Is Torture? Ask Christopher Hitchens

July 2nd, 2008

Via: Guardian:

Late last year, the writer, polemicist and fierce proponent of the US-led invasion of Iraq Christopher Hitchens attempted, in a piece for the online magazine Slate, to draw a distinction between what he called techniques of “extreme interrogation” and “outright torture”.

From this, his foes inferred that since it was Hitchens’ belief that America did not stoop to the latter, the practice of waterboarding – known to be perpetrated by US forces against certain “high-value clients” in Iraq and elsewhere – must fall under the former heading.

Enraged by what they saw as an exercise in elegant but offensive sophistry, some of the writer’s critics suggested that Hitchens give waterboarding (which may sound like some kind of fun aquatic pastime, but is probably best summarised as enforced partial drowning) a whirl, just to see what it was like. Did the experience feel like torture?

And amazingly, he has done just that. In August’s edition of Vanity Fair, you can read all about it, and see more photographs of the “wheezing, paunchy, 59-year-old scribbler”, his head hooded, being subjected to this most terrifying of ordeals by veterans of the US Special Forces. A video is due to be posted soon at vf.com, though that may be a bit too much to bear.

So what did it feel like? Hitchens recounts how he was lashed tightly to a sloping board, then, “on top of the hood, three layers of enveloping towel were added. In this pregnant darkness, head downward, I waited until I abruptly felt a slow cascade of water going up my nose … I held my breath for a while and then had to exhale and – as you might expect – inhale in turn.”

That, he says, “brought the damp cloths tight against my nostrils, as if a huge, wet paw had been suddenly and annihilatingly clamped over my face. Unable to determine whether I was breathing in or out, flooded more with sheer panic than with water, I triggered the pre-arranged signal” and felt the “unbelievable relief” of being pulled upright.

The “official lie” about waterboarding, Hitchens says, is that it “simulates the feeling of drowning”. In fact, “you are drowning – or rather, being drowned”.

He rehearses the intellectual arguments, both for (“It’s nothing compared to what they do to us”) and against (“It opens a door that can’t be closed”). But the Hitch’s thoroughly empirical conclusion is simple. As Vanity Fair’s title puts it: “Believe me, it’s torture.”


« Previous Page — Next Page »