So, What Was “It”? If Anything…
December 1st, 2007Well, I’m waiting to hear about the Mr. Fusion, or whatever the hell Gore and the Gang were supposed to see in London tonight. So far, there’s no mention of any new energy system being unveiled.
Forget the Green Technology – The Hot Money Is in Guns
December 1st, 2007Naomi Klein gets close, but misses the mark. For those of us who understand clean, green fascism, it’s not a question of clean energy technology OR armaments and surveillance; it’s both.
You won’t have viable clean technology without a total, fascist lockdown. I’ve said it from the beginning, and I’m saying it now. The technology to build the techno green utopia has been around for easily thirty years. Sorry folks, that’s not how it went, and that’s not how it’s going to go. The primacy of new killing technologies and technologies of political control go hand in hand with the clean energy systems.
The Blackwater USA mercenaries and the Global Warming fart tax crowd are on the same team, whether they realize it or not. Control access to energy and you control pretty much everything, and collect a handsome tax on pretty much everything as a result. The more readily available the energy, the more accessible it is to everyone, the more control will be required to maintain the established order and keep people continuously paying corporations for the privilege of being able to turn on the lights and cook a meal.
The problem is not energy scarcity, but rather energy abundance, and the follow on problems that energy abundance creates for Them.
Sheesh! What do I have to do, write a book about it!? Is this clear to anyone but me?
Via: Guardian:
Anyone tired of lousy news from the markets should talk to Douglas Lloyd, a director of Venture Business Research, which tracks trends in venture capitalism. “I expect investment activity in this sector to remain buoyant,” he said recently. Lloyd’s bouncy mood was inspired by the money that is gushing into private security and defence companies. He added: “I also see this as a more attractive sector, as many do, than clean energy.”
Got that? If you are looking for a sure bet in a new growth market, then sell solar and buy surveillance: forget wind, buy weapons.
This observation – coming from an executive who is trusted by such clients as Goldman Sachs and Marsh & McLennan – deserves particular attention in the run-up to the United Nations climate change conference, which takes place in Bali next week. There, world environment ministers are supposed to come up with the global pact that will replace the Kyoto agreement.
The Bush administration, still roadblocking firm caps on emissions, wants to let the market solve the crisis. “We’re on the threshold of dramatic technological breakthroughs,” the American president assured the world last January, adding: “We’ll leave it to the market to decide the mix of fuels that most effectively and efficiently meet this goal.”
The idea that capitalism can save us from climate catastrophe has powerful appeal. It gives politicians an excuse to subsidise corporations rather than to regulate them; and it neatly avoids a discussion about how the core market logic of endless growth landed us here in the first place.
The market, however, appears to have other ideas about how to meet the challenges of an increasingly disaster-prone world. According to Lloyd, the really big money – despite all the government incentives – is turning away from clean-energy technologies, and is banking instead on gadgets that promise to seal wealthy countries and individuals into hi-tech fortresses. Key growth areas in venture capitalism are private security firms selling surveillance gear and privatised emergency response. To put it simply, in the world of venture capitalism, there has been a race going on between greens on the one hand, and guns and garrisons on the other – and the guns and garrisons are winning.
FOIA Request for Documents Related to the Plunge Protection Team Yields, “177 Pages of Crap”
November 30th, 2007Via: NY Post:
November 29, 2007 — AFTER a year and a half of stalling, the US Treasury finally complied with The Post’s requests for information about The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets – by delivering 177 pages of crap.
In essence, the Treasury’s Freedom of Information officials said that the Working Group – affectionately nicknamed the Plunge Protection Team – doesn’t keep records of its meetings.
How interesting and convenient!
Included in the 177 pages that the Treasury said responded to our request on the actions of The President’s Working Group were 53 pages on which something was redacted – blacked out so that the discussion was unreadable.
Many of those 53 pages contained no words at all – just a big black blob.
Starting in June of 2006 The Post asked for an accounting of the actions of The President’s Working Group, which was formed under President Reagan. The Group seems to have the ill-defined task of keeping an eye on the financial markets. We also asked for e-mails related to our request through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The Working Group operates out of the Treasury Department and includes the heads of the various exchanges in the US, as well as top-ranking government officials.
Hank Paulson, the Treasury Secretary, and Ben Bernanke, the head of the Federal Reserve, are the two most prominent members.
Back in August, Paulson said in a television interview that “we’ve reenergized The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets.”
The Wall Street Journal last year said that Paulson, upon becoming Treasury Secretary, was insisting that the Working Group meet every six weeks.
Whatever the schedule of meetings, one of those meetings occurred on Aug. 17 – the day the Federal Reserve surprised the financial markets with a cut in its discount rate.
According to records that someone else got from Bernanke’s office through a FOIA request, there was an 11 a.m. conference call on Aug. 17 of the “PWG” – the President’s Working Group.
Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and Patrick Parkinson, a Treasury staffer, took part in that call, according to Bernanke’s phone log.
The day before – Aug. 16 – Bernanke and Paulson had lunch, but it isn’t clear whether this was just two guys having a meal or if it, too, was related to The President’s Working Group.
Hours after that lunch, word got around on Wall Street that the Fed was about to make a move and the stock market staged a tremendous rally.
The next day those rumors of Fed action proved accurate.
So what’s the Working Group up to?
I suspect the group is ready to come to the rescue of the financial markets – even equities – in the case of a meltdown.
And as I’ve said in the past, that would be a completely acceptable task as long as it remains a limited power that is used infrequently.
But who decides when a rescue is needed?
And if no records are kept, who is held accountable if The Working Group’s power is abused?
U.S. Government, Banks Near a Plan to Freeze Subprime Rates
November 30th, 2007This Wall Street Journal front page story reads like news from some banana republic! You’ve got millions of slobs who took out toxic waste, impossible to pay back loans and the largest banks in the land engaged in a Mexican standoff.
Who’s going to pay for all those subprime mortgage lotto winners?
U.S. Dollar holders, that’s who.
And think of the message that this will send to prudent, responsible home buyers who took fixed rate loans! Are they going to hit the mortgage lotto, too? Or do they just get to watch their savings go up in smoke to save the large banks?
Holy crap.
Via: Wall Street Journal:
The Bush administration and major financial institutions are close to agreeing on a plan that would temporarily freeze interest rates on certain troubled subprime home loans, according to people familiar with the negotiations.
An accord could reassure investors and strapped homeowners, both of whom are anxious as interest rates on more than two million adjustable mortgages are scheduled to jump over the next two years. It could also give a boost to the Bush administration, which is facing criticism for inaction amid the recent housing turmoil.
The plan is being negotiated between regulators including the Treasury Department and a coalition of mortgage-related companies including Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co., Washington Mutual Inc. and Countrywide Financial Corp. People familiar with the talks say the individual members have agreed to follow any agreement reached by the coalition, which is called the Hope Now Alliance.
Details of the plan, which could be announced as early as next week, are still being worked out. In general, the government and the coalition have largely agreed to extend the lower introductory rate on home loans for certain borrowers who will have trouble making payments once their mortgages increase.
Many subprime loans carry a low “teaser” interest rate for the first two or three years, then reset to a higher rate for the remainder of the term, which is typically 30 years in total. In a typical case, the rate would rise to around 9.5% to 11% from 7% or 8%. That would boost an average borrower’s payment by several hundred dollars a month.
Exactly which borrowers will qualify for the freeze and how long the freeze would last are yet to be determined. Under one scenario, the freeze could run as long as seven years. The parties are developing standard criteria that would determine eligibility. The criteria should be finalized by the end of year.
Mortgage servicers — the companies that collect loan payments — are a key part of the coalition, because they are the companies that deal directly with borrowers. Often the servicer is different from the company that originally made the loan. Citigroup and Countrywide are among the nation’s biggest mortgage servicers. The mortgage servicers in the coalition represent 84% of the overall subprime market. The coalition also includes lenders, investors and mortgage counselors.
The Bush administration has been looking for ways to stem the fallout from the mortgage crisis. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson helped assemble the coalition so that government officials could have a single counterpart with which to discuss terms of a plan.
While the government can’t force the industry to modify loans, Mr. Paulson and other administration officials have been using moral suasion to push for workouts, telling the companies it is in their interest to avoid foreclosure since most parties can lose money when that happens. A similar plan to freeze interest rates temporarily was recently announced by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and four major loan servicers, including Countrywide.
Among the holdouts have been investors, who typically hold securities backed by mortgages. If interest rates are frozen, they would lose the potential benefit of higher payments. But investors have cautiously moved toward cooperation, likely on the grounds that it’s better to get some interest than none at all.
Research Credit: PD
Cryptogon Readers Send Contributions
November 30th, 2007Wow! A flurry of contributions came in over the last few days:
DK $5
DM $5
Eileen $50
Pookie $155
Thank you.
More than 50,000 Lost Their Homes in October
November 29th, 2007The momentum phase has only just begun.
Via: CNN:
Foreclosure filings nearly doubled in October and more people could lose their homes in 2008, according to a report released Thursday.
In October, 224,451 foreclosure filings were reported nationwide, up 94 percent from October 2006 and up 2 percent from September, according to RealtyTrac.
In the month, 53,609 U.S. homeowners were forced out of homes repossessed by banks, up from 20,768 a year ago, the firm said. Through October, a total of 309,557 homes have been repossessed by banks leading to forced evictions.
“Some people are in over their heads, owing more than what they can sell their house for,” said RealtyTrac spokesman Daren Blomquist.
For the full year, RealtyTrac expects 2 million homes to have entered the foreclosure process – including bank repossessions, default notices and auction sale notices.
Foreclosures could hit homeowners even harder in the beginning of 2008, Blomquist said. Homeowners experiencing trouble in the fall may not see a foreclosure notice until the January or later, he said.
On top of that, adjustable-rate mortgages are scheduled to reset in greater numbers through 2008, sending homeowners’ monthly mortgage payments higher, possibly to unmanageable levels.
“The other side of the vise pressing on these people is that it’s harder to refinance because lenders’ standards are tighter,” Blomquist added.
Explosion on Strategic Canadian Pipelines that Supply 1.5 Million Barrels of Oil Per Day to U.S.
November 29th, 2007Awaiting damage assessment… Readers in the Midwestern U.S. should keep an eye on this. I’m assuming that the government can dip into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, but… With winter kicking in, take no chances.
UPDATE 1: DO NOT ASSUME SPR AVAILABILITY FOR THIS:
Landlocked inland refiners such as Flint Hills Resources’ 280,000 barrels per day (bpd) refinery in Rosmount, Minnesota, that rely on the pipeline for the baseload supplies, would have to drag additional shipments inland from the Gulf or East Coast that could reverberate.
“The only way to supply refiners that do not have Canadian crude is to send crudes from the Gulf Coast up the pipelines. These are mostly light sweet crude,” a Singapore-based trader said.
That will create a knock-on impact for demand for similar high-sulphur, dense crudes that can be shipped to the United States such as Russia’s main Urals blend or Middle East grades such as Oman, which rarely travels to U.S. shores.
Much will now depend on the duration of the outage, and whether the U.S. government reaches into its 700 million-barrel Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to try to fill the gap — although logistics may make that tricky.
*** “The problem is that the SPR oil is all in PADD III Gulf Coast, while the crude imports that have been lost are all in PADD II Midwest, and there is limited transport capacity between the two,” Sempra analyst John Kemp said. ***
…
The explosion on Wednesday about 3.0 miles (4.8 km) southeast of its Clearbrook, Minnesota, terminal shut down a line that carries nearly one-fifth of U.S. crude oil imports.
— END UPDATE —
UPDATE 2: Two of Four Pipelines Restarted:
LONDON, Nov 29 (Reuters) – Two of the four pipelines supplying Canadian crude to U.S. Midwest refineries has restarted after an explosion halted nearly a fifth of U.S. imports, operator Enbridge said on Thursday.
The pipelines, with a total capacity of 646,000 barrels per day, restarted operations a few hours ago, the company’s spokesman said.
Two employees were killed in the blast and fire on one of the four pipelines. Enbridge said in a statement that the cause of the explosion had not yet been determined.
Larry Springer, the company spokesman, said the main fire has been extinguished.
— END UPDATE —
Couldn’t letter’ drop below $90, could they? I kid, of course…
Well, mostly, I kid…
Fascinating, though, the timing of this… Oil dropping the most since January over a two day period:
Nov. 28 (Bloomberg) — Crude oil fell, reaching its biggest two-day drop since January, as a U.S. government report showed that supplies declined less than expected.
…and then * BOOOOOOM!!! *
Via: Bloomberg:
Enbridge Inc., Canada’s largest pipeline company, said a fire at one of its pipelines that supply crude oil to the U.S. is still burning after a blast yesterday that killed two workers.
The company closed the four pipelines of the Lakehead system, capable of delivering 1.5 million barrels a day, and “at least one or two lines will be shut down for quite some time,” spokeswoman Denise Hamsher said today by telephone from Clearbrook, Minnesota, where Enbridge operates a terminal.
Oil surged more than $4 a barrel, the most in a month, after a leak and explosion occurred at the No. 3 pipeline, which was undergoing maintenance. Canada was the largest exporter of oil to the U.S. in August, delivering 1.9 million barrels a day that month, according to the latest statistics from the U.S. Department of Energy.
“This is a very important pipeline (system), which is why we see a knee-jerk reaction in crude oil prices to the news of the shutdown,” Lawrence Eagles, an analyst with the Paris-based International Energy Agency, said today. “There is a tendency for people to assume the worst, but we need to look at the extent of the damage and how long the shutdown will last.”
Crude oil for January delivery gained as much as $4.55, or 5 percent, to $95.17 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. That’s the biggest increase since Oct. 31. The contract, which rose for the first time this week, traded at $94.17 at 9:29 a.m. in London.
Visual Inspections
Enbridge is waiting for the fire to burn out before inspecting the Lakehead system, spokesman Larry Springer said by telephone from San Antonio today.
“We want to get in and visually inspect lines 1 and 2, but until the fire is down a little bit more we can’t do that,” Springer said. “If they are OK then we would be able to consider restarting those.”
Enbridge’s Hamsher said the company will know by tomorrow if some of the pipelines can be safely restarted. The blast occurred about 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) from the Clearbrook terminal, the Calgary-based company said in a statement distributed yesterday by Market Wire.
“The site is not accessible right now and we are unable to assess the damage,” Hamsher said. “We are working with the emergency services on putting out the fire, and our top priority is the safety of all our workers.”
Lakehead System
The Lakehead network carries oil from the Canadian border to Chicago and Detroit with an extension to Buffalo, New York, according to the Enbridge Web site.
The system delivered an average of 1.5 million barrels a day in 2006, according to the Web site of Enbridge Energy Partners LP, the subsidiary that operates Lakehead. That represented 71 percent of refinery demand in Minnesota, 62 percent in the greater Chicago area, and 82 percent in Ontario.
Billionaires, Global Elite Will Gather in London for Unveiling of Clean Energy System
November 29th, 2007Oh man, I couldn’t make it up if I tried.
Via: Independent:
A discovery that could give the world access to vast quantities of energy with minimal damage to the climate will be shown off for the first time at a glittering gathering of the famous, rich and influential next Friday night.
Al Gore is to be the star turn at a dinner where guests have paid at least £1,000 a head, and some will have parted with £50,000 for their share of the Aberdeen Angus steak and pink champagne, under the high ornate ceilings of London’s Royal Courts of Justice. The combined wealth of the diners has been estimated at £100bn. But the most unusual aspect of the evening is not the price of the tickets but the nature of the floor show. In place of professional performers, the guests will be regaled by people who are not always thought of as entertainers, though some think they are all mad. They are inventive British boffins who care about climate change.
They are hoping that the showcase dinner will knock years off the time it can take for industry to see the mass marketing potential of a new discovery. And the one that will be shown to Mr Gore and fellow guests is highly marketable and could revolutionise the market in clean technology, according to the founder of the British Inventors’ Society, Kane Kramer.
Mr Kramer, who was 23 in 1979 when he conceptualised the technology that led to the creation of the first MP3 player, refused to give specific details of the new discovery, or to name the inventor, so as to maintain the element of surprise for Friday. But he indicated that it is a breakthrough in micro-technology, and that British scientists who have tested it are convinced that it will work.
“This is something … that’s the accumulation of almost a decade of work,” he said. “It’s a new science, a Super Material. It would be 80 per cent cheaper than any alternative means of production, and it will contribute in a major way to reducing climate change.
“I like it because it’s kind of lateral. It will make possible things that weren’t possible before. We have put it through severe ‘due diligence’, with quite a team of people, not just in the UK, and we’re completely 100 per cent sure that this is the way forward.”
There is an old saying that if you invent a better mousetrap the world will beat a path to your door, but he says the adage is true only for inventions that improve gadgets that are already known to work. Big corporations can be very coy about putting money into something genuinely new. “Business wants to jump on a bandwagon, not build the bandwagon,” he said. It is also widely suspected that a lot of energy saving ideas have been bought out by the energy companies precisely to keep them off the market.
But the dinner, organised by a foundation called Fortune Forum, will also be used to launch a new campaigning group called the ICE Circle, whose mission is to put inventors of clean energy technologies in touch with investors to market them. The combination of British inventors and mega-rich philanthropists will be a “marriage made in heaven”, Mr Kramer reckons.
Domestic Spying, Inc.
November 29th, 2007Excellent piece. I highly recommend clicking through to read the entire thing.
Via: CorpWatch:
A new intelligence institution to be inaugurated soon by the Bush administration will allow government spying agencies to conduct broad surveillance and reconnaissance inside the United States for the first time. Under a proposal being reviewed by Congress, a National Applications Office (NAO) will be established to coordinate how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and domestic law enforcement and rescue agencies use imagery and communications intelligence picked up by U.S. spy satellites. If the plan goes forward, the NAO will create the legal mechanism for an unprecedented degree of domestic intelligence gathering that would make the U.S. one of the world’s most closely monitored nations. Until now, domestic use of electronic intelligence from spy satellites was limited to scientific agencies with no responsibility for national security or law enforcement.
The intelligence-sharing system to be managed by the NAO will rely heavily on private contractors including Boeing, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). These companies already provide technology and personnel to U.S. agencies involved in foreign intelligence, and the NAO greatly expands their markets. Indeed, at an intelligence conference in San Antonio, Texas, last month, the titans of the industry were actively lobbying intelligence officials to buy products specifically designed for domestic surveillance.
The NAO was created under a plan tentatively approved in May 2007 by Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell. Specifically, the NAO will oversee how classified information collected by the National Security Agency (NSA), the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and other key agencies is used within the U.S. during natural disasters, terrorist attacks and other events affecting national security. The most critical intelligence will be supplied by the NSA and the NGA, which are often referred to by U.S. officials as the “eyes†and “ears†of the intelligence community.
High-Tech Drones Joining Miami Police Force
November 29th, 2007Via: Local10:
The Miami-Dade police department will begin experimenting with high-tech drones as law enforcement tools beginning next year.
Although the military has been using unmanned aircraft systems for years, this will be the first time they are used in law enforcement.
…
“The capability of the unit is phenomenal,” said Miami-Dade Detective Juan Villalba.
The unmanned aircraft will be used during SWAT team and tactical operations, especially when officers need video of a heavily armed suspect.
The Miami-Dade police department has not yet taken possession on its drone, but the Houston police department has and is already conducting tests.
Miami-Dade hopes to use grant money to pay for the MAV. Officials said the units are pricey. Depending on the complexity of the system, they can cost several thousand dollars to more than a million.


