Taiwan Plans to Build Ocean Power System with Output that Far Exceeds Current Demand
July 20th, 2007Via: Taiwan Headlines:
The government is now discussing the possibility of large-scale ocean current power generation, using the strong Kuroshio current off the east coast of Taiwan to generate up to 1.68 trillion kilowatt-hours per year, officials at cabinet-level Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) said Monday.
The project task force, led by Chen Fa-lin — director of Energy and Environment Research Laboratory under Hsinchu-based Industrial Technology Research Institute, is currently working on fine-tuning the guidelines, which will be presented to CEPD senior officials in August or September.
After the project is green-lighted, the possible first step should be setting up a five-megawatt marine turbine off Taiwan’s east coast on a trial basis, with the goal of testing both related technologies and power-generating efficiency, CEPD officials, adding that hopefully, the project can enter the next stage in three years.
“Current power generation is not a new idea, ” officials noted. “Countries like Britain, Canada, Norway, and Australia all have experience in deploying offshore marine turbines with capacities ranging from one megawatt to eight megawatts to support the electricity demand of hundreds to thousands of households.”
“The problem is not the technology itself but how to locate a suitable site — with a current strong enough, an undersea shelf not too deep, and a distance short enough to achieve power supply efficiency,” they added.
However, they explained that based on the surveys done by National Taiwan University (NTU) , the sea area of some 6,000 square kilometers between the eastern county of Taitung and the outlying Green Island in the Pacific Ocean appears to meet all the requirements, and that the maximum potential capacity there exceeds 1.68 trillion kilowatt- hours per year — while Taiwan’s current annual demand of electricity is only about 98 billion kilowatt-hours.
According to the estimates of the project task force, a given site of 25 square kilometers located in the “shallow, high-speed zone” could support the deployment of 1,000 one-megawatt marine turbines, which would have a peak capacity of 1,000 megawatts: equal to the output of Taiwan’s second nuclear power plant.
Chen, the project leader, noted that once the turbines enter commercial operation, Taiwan’s existing coal power plants could be retired, while the nuclear power generators could be used as a backup system — thereby resulting in a great reduction in Taiwan’s total carbon dioxide emissions.
Related: The International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project
Related: Remote New Zealand Tidal Power Project
Related: Linear Induction Wave Buoys
Related: Canary Island to be Powered Solely by Renewables
Attorney Acquitted on Federal Income Tax Charges
July 19th, 2007Maybe the Browns should have hired this guy for their trial…
Via: Shreveport Times:
A Shreveport attorney who has challenged the government for years on the legality of filing federal income taxes has been acquitted on charges he failed to file returns.
A federal jury unanimously found Tommy Cryer not guilty this week on two misdemeanor counts of failure to file.
And according to Cryer, the prosecution dismissed two felony charges of tax evasion prior to trial.
Attempts by The Times on Thursday to reach U.S. Attorney Donald Washington or Bill Flanagan, first assistant U.S. attorney, were not successful. Calls made to the two were not immediately returned.
“The court could not find a law that makes me liable or makes my revenues taxable,” Cryer said. “The Supreme Court has ruled that the government cannot impose an income tax on anything but the profits and gains. When you work for someone you give your service and labor in exchange for money, so everything you make is not profit or gain. You put something into it.”
Cryer was indicted last year on two counts of tax evasion. The indictment alleged he evaded payment of $73,000 in income tax to the Internal Revenue Service during 2000 and 2001.
Cryer created a trust listing himself as the trustee, and received payments of dividends, interest and stock income to that trust, according to the indictment. He also was accused of concealing his receipt of the sources of income from the IRS by failing to file a tax return on behalf of that trust.
“I determined that my personal earnings were not 100 percent profits, some were income,” Cryer said. “I refuse to file, I refuse to pay unless they can show me I have a lawful reason to pay.”
“What I earned was my own personal labor. I am giving something in exchange. I’m giving my property and I don’t belong to anyone else.”
Cryer says he stopped filing returns more than 10 years ago after he investigated claims that income tax was a sham. He contends the law doesn’t actually tax personal earning.
Bush Signs New Executive Order that Allows U.S. Government to Seize Assets without Due Process
July 19th, 2007Via: TPMmuckraker:
In a little-noticed executive order issued on Tuesday, President Bush directed the Treasury Department to block the U.S.-based financial assets of anyone deemed to have threatened “the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq” or who “undermin(e) efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq.”
The order empowers Treasury, in consultation with the State and Defense Departments, to target those individuals or organizations that either “have committed, or … pose a significant risk of committing” acts of violence with the “purpose or effect” of harming the Iraqi government or hindering reconstruction efforts. It applies to “U.S. persons,” a category including American citizens. It had not previously been disclosed — and still hasn’t — that U.S. persons are abetting the Iraqi insurgency, nor that Iraqi insurgents have property in the United States, raising questions about who in fact the order targets.
“The part where they reserve lots of discretion to themselves is the list of conditions that goes beyond determination of acts of violence. ‘Threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq,’ that could be anything,” says Ken Mayer, an expert in executive orders and a University of Wisconsin political scientist. “Think of the possibilities: it could be charities that send a small amount of money (to groups linked to) the insurgency, or it could be the government of Iran that has assets in the U.S. and has money that flows through a U.S. bank or something like that.”
The order permits the targeting of those who aid someone else whose assets have been blocked under the order — wittingly or not. And under Section Five, the government does not have to disclose which organizations are subject to having their assets frozen:
For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.
The scope of the order has raised civil-liberties concerns. “Certainly it is highly constitutionally questionable to empower the government to destroy someone economically without giving notice,” says Bruce Fein, a Justice Department official in the Reagan administration. “This is so sweeping it’s staggering. I’ve never seen anything so broad that it expands beyond terrorism, beyond seeking to use violence or the threat of violence to cower or intimidate a population. This covers stabilization in Iraq. I suppose you could issue an executive order about stabilization in Afghanistan as well. And it goes beyond even attempting violence, to cover those who pose ‘a significant risk’ of violence. Suppose Congress passed a law saying you’ve committed a crime if there’s significant risk that you might commit a crime.”
Representatives from the ACLU are still studying the executive order. But preliminarily, says spokeswoman Liz Rose, the order appears to expand the assets-seizure provisions of the Patriot Act, known as Section 806, to organizations linked to Iraqi insurgent groups. Much like the order, Section 806 allows the government to seize assets of banned organizations without prior notice and without a conviction of involvement in banned activity. “It is by far the most significant change (in the law) of which political organizations need to be aware,” the ACLU wrote in 2002, contending that the vagueness of Section 806 potentially implicates legitimate political protest as well as material support for terrorism.
Stolen U.S. Vehicles End Up as Bombs in Iraq, FBI Says
July 19th, 2007The insurgents are getting a hold of stolen SUVs that just happen to be the same as those used by American mercenaries who are operating in Iraq.
Sure.
I don’t know WTF is going on in Iraq, but the CIA has a long history of using stolen aircraft to carry guns and drugs. Hmm.
Via: International Herald Tribune:
Bought and sold on the international black market, cars and trucks help fund criminal operations and can be turned into the terrorist weapon of choice against U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians: vehicles packed with explosives. The FBI declined to estimate how many stolen U.S. cars have turned up as car bombs in Iraq but said the number is believed to be at least in the dozens.
The National Motor Vehicle Title Information System was created in 1992 to thwart motor vehicle thefts, but it remains a patchwork repository at best.
Authorities say the system, which has the potential to track every car or truck in the country by its vehicle identification number, has languished because of years of local government inattention, a lack of urgency among state motor vehicle departments, and inconsistent federal funding.
“A car bomb is the absolute favorite delivery method of terrorists,” said Special Agent Ryan Toole of the FBI’s Major Theft Unit in Washington, who is working to get the database completed. “Tracing that VIN is very, very important” to identifying where the vehicle originated or determining how it ended up in terrorist hands.
Toole said American-made vehicles are particularly attractive to terrorists in places such as Iraq. Forensics specialists there have identified some bomb-rigged cars as vehicles that were swiped off American streets and sold overseas by criminal gangs and organized crime syndicates.
Terrorists desire a “vehicle like a Suburban because it can hold a lot but it also blends in,” said Toole, who is leading the FBI’s efforts to complete the database.
That particular Chevrolet SUV model is popular, he said, because “it looks like an American security vehicle” in Iraq and “they can get closer to their target than if it was a beat-up old Toyota.”
Total Declares Force Majeure in Angola
July 19th, 2007Via: Bloomberg:
Crude oil rose to an 11-month high in New York after Total SA lost production and declared force majeure at the Dalia field in Angola.
Total’s decision covered half the oil pumped at the offshore field, which had produced 240,000 barrels a day, said Patricia Marie, a company spokeswoman. A generator failure caused the problem. Oil also gained because the U.S. government said gasoline stockpiles fell last week as imports plunged and demand climbed.
The Total news has pushed oil higher “because it’s a serious supply cut,” said Jon House, a crude oil trader with Macquarie Bank Ltd. in London. The U.S. “stats were bullish.”
Crude oil for August delivery gained as much as 66 cents, or 0.9 percent, to $75.71 a barrel in after-hours electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It traded at $75.55 at 11:59 a.m. in London.
Oil companies working in Africa have faced a series of disruptions in the past year. Militant attacks shut down about a quarter of the production in Nigeria, the continent’s biggest producer. A fire cut output from Total’s N’kossa field in the Republic of Congo, which was due to resume on Aug. 1.
Force majeure, a legal measure that exempts a company from fulfilling a contract because of circumstances beyond its control, was declared at the Angola field yesterday, Marie said. It should be lifted in one or two days, she said.
New Zealand Economy on ‘Death Spiral’ Due to Exchange Rate; Government Considering Emergency Monetary Policies
July 19th, 2007In case you’ve forgotten where I’ve been on this issue, let’s take a quick walk down memory lane, now that the New Zealand Government is considering emergency monetary policies, and the country teeters on the brink of ruin…
Cryptogon analysis from April 3, 2007:
Mainly, this is wealthy people from all over the place chasing better rates on cash bets. That’s really what’s behind this. In the process, New Zealand farmers are going to get nailed to a cross made out of yen and euros.
Obviously, the world wants what New Zealand has. If the New Zealand Government had any courage at all, they would stand up and demand tangible assets for New Zealand’s premium goods so New Zealand could move toward eliminating its high debt and finding a more sensible economic path to tread. The longer New Zealand plays by the rules established by U.S. and European bankers, the worse off the next bust will be.
By allowing this carry trade nonsense to continue, the New Zealand Government is ensuring catastrophe down the road. They’re trying to curb the spending of New Zealanders with higher rates while allowing this funny money casino to continue for wealthy foreigners. Who’s got the balls to stand up and say “No more carry trade swindling.†Helen Clark? HA New Zealand won’t even demand goods to be labeled with their country of origin so it’s fully nuts to contemplate reigning in the operations of the casino. But it’s too late now anyway. The NZ economy would sink like a rusty old ship that just had a massive hole blown through its guts, far below the waterline, if ANY move was made to even slow the funny money racket. Catastrophe later, I guess, is better than catastrophe now.
Cryptogon analysis from April 13, 2007:
I don’t know who’s behind the wheel of this thing, but it’s not Kiwis. There is some kind of insidious, international banking octopus thing happening here. New Zealand politicians are selling their own country out to a global criminal elite that is going to eat this land alive and spit what remains out into the sea.
Cryptogon analysis from June 11, 2007:
If it does get squeezed higher, regardless of the central bank’s actions, the New Zealand government could be forced to use non market methods to control the thing. * gasp * That would rattle the chook house. Of course, anyone in polite circles would call that “crazy talk†at this point; like much of the stuff on Cryptogon that eventually came to pass. The fact is, the New Zealand government is NOT in control of its own financial house. If it was, they wouldn’t have let this nonsense go as far as it has. Now, they’re going through all the motions, talking tough and maintaining appearances, but don’t be surprised if the global casino operators look at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and say, “Pfft! How’s about a game of chicken, boy!?â€
Well, here we are… Things going down the gurgler and American Reagan-era banking cronies are on the radio, suggesting that New Zealand peg its currency to the U.S. Dollar, “an absurdity supported only by faith.” Or is that the Amero? How about a Pacifico? I know: The Newstralian Dollar!
Via: New Zealand Herald:
The New Zealand economy is on a death spiral by having a free, floating exchange rate combined with inflation targeting, according to a leading US economist.
Steve Hanke, fellow of the Cato Institute and professor at Baltimore’s Johns Hopkins University, said New Zealand should abandon its free-floating exchange rate and peg it to a key larger currency such as the US dollar, or a basket of currencies.
His comments come as the New Zealand dollar continues to soar towards US80c, a record since it was floated 22 years ago. It has risen 27 per cent this year alone, crippling many exporters.
The kiwi peaked around 4am at US79.45c but later slipped back and was at US79.26c at 11.57am.
Finance Minister Michael Cullen cause a storm when he hinted yesterday he could use emergency powers to suspend the Reserve Bank’s sole focus on inflation.
Most economists expect the Reserve Bank to put further upward pressure on the exchange rate next week by hiking interest rates for the fifth time this year and economists from at least two leading banks said a sixth hike is probable in August.
Prof Hanke, an adviser to the late former president Ronald Reagan, told Radio New Zealand today the currency cannot be allowed to continue its violent fluctuations.
The current framework left New Zealand “like a dog chasing its tail”.
To fight inflation the Reserve Bank hiked interest rates, but because New Zealand had higher interest rates than other developed countries because it is a small economy, that attracted a flood of capital from offshore where rates are lower, which pushed up the exchange rate.
He said that aggravated the inflation problem and the central bank then had to increase rates again and start the whole cycle again.
“In a way it’s a kind of death spiral you’re in.”
Prof Hanke said it was inappropriate in a small, open economy to have a system of inflation targeting and a free, floating exchange rate.
“It’s obvious to everyone that this isn’t the paradise that everyone thought it was.”
New Zealanders Decry Ban on Political Satire
July 19th, 2007Why would anyone want to make fun of Members of Parliament?
Via: Angus-Reid:
The vast majority of people in New Zealand are against a recent rule approved by lawmakers that bans using images captured inside Parliament to satirize, ridicule or denigrate lawmakers on broadcast and print media, according to a poll by TNS released by TV3. 71 per cent of respondents disapprove of this measure.
Gold, Oil and the U.S. Dollar All Nearing Key Levels
July 19th, 2007WARNING: This is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any financial instrument.
Gold and oil are both locked and loaded for a major breakout from previous ranges. The dollar’s move down has been fast and astonishing, even to people like me who have no confidence in the thing.
If the U.S. Dollar Index was a gun battle, 80 represents the point at which guys would be fixing bayonets to their rifles. I don’t know who’s defending the dollar at this stage, but they will have to fight to the death to stop the decline at 80. Will They be able to hold 80? I tend to doubt it. But They will be able to cause one hell of a dead cat bounce at that level, as suckers try to believe that a bottom is in. Crashes are always punctuated by sucker bounces. That’s a critical point to keep in mind as you take in the big picture.
Look at a year chart on gold. See that triple top ahead? Folks, when that resistance finally cracks, my guess is that you’ll be kicking yourself if you’re not on board that thing. Of course, it might bounce off that $680-$690 range again to form a quadruple top. HA. There’s no point in trying to put a percent chance on outcomes, but I’d say that there’s a better chance of gold breaking higher than breaking down substantially.
Now that’s just the mumbo jumbo technical trader talk, which may or may not have anything to do with anything. I don’t bother with the fundamental arguments much, because, well, fundamentals don’t matter as much when leverage is involved. But is this the point at which the gold fundamentals are going to come home to roost? You never know. I wouldn’t count on it, but it wouldn’t surprise me if they did.
This is my plan: I’m going to wait for a sucker bounce (Plunge Protection Team) on the U.S. Dollar, which will knock gold down a fair whack. I’ll be standing by the pull the trigger long on more gold when the headlines start talking about “The Comeback of the Dollar” and “Overbought Gold.”
Of course, the above plan assumes nothing blows up. If you think event risk is real and imminent, you shouldn’t wait. In times of disequalibrium in the market, I can tell you from experience, you want to be in before the panicked sheep figure it out. If you wait to try to chase a move after the news hits, you’ll probably botch the entry badly. Waiting for clarity never pays, and with trading, it never never pays.
New Zealand: Firms Secretely Developing Algae Derived Jet Fuel
July 19th, 2007I’ve been wondering what They had in mind for jet aircraft, since even the Eestor thing wouldn’t have the power density required for that application.
Well, now we know.
Look at how trivial the amounts of money are with regard to the financial backing of this company. It’s bum change.
I wonder who the “international cornerstone shareholder” is…
Via: Stuff:
Air New Zealand and airliner manufacturer Boeing are secretly working with Blenheim-based biofuel developer Aquaflow Bionomic Corporation to create the world’s first environmentally friendly aviation fuel, made of wild algae.
If the project pans out the small and relatively new New Zealand company could lead the world in environmentally sustainable aviation fuel.
It’s understood Air NZ is undertaking risk analysis. If everything stacks up it will make an aircraft available on the Tasman to test the biofuel.
The fuel is essentially derived from bacterial pond scum created through the photosynthesis of sunlight and carbon dioxide on nutrient-rich water sources such as sewage ponds.
Air NZ would most likely test the fuel on one engine while normal aviation fuel would drive the other engine. Fuel is held in cells on the aircraft that can be directed to a specific engine.
None of the parties involved will talk about the joint venture development because of confidentiality agreements but whispers about the project were circulating at the roll-out of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner in Seattle in the US last week.
Local Marlborough media reported a visit by Boeing to Aquaflow earlier this year and Boeing has stated publicly since then that it believes algae is the airline fuel of the future.
…
Aquaflow director Vicki Buck said yesterday that she couldn’t talk about any ventures with anyone because to do so would compromise projects on the drawing board.
But she did say a $5 million capital-raising had been successful and the company now had a major international cornerstone shareholder.
The company had also received $90,000 of funding from the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology and would seek further funding for the commercialisation of its technology later this year.
A Survival Imperative for Space Colonization
July 18th, 2007What? The skyscraper farms won’t do the trick?
Via: New York Times:
“In 1970 everyone figured we’d have humans on Mars by now, but we haven’t taken the opportunity,†Dr. Gott says. “We should it do soon, because colonizing other worlds is our best chance to hedge our bets and improve the survival prospects of our species. Sooner or later something will get us if we stay on one planet. By the time we’re in trouble and wish we had that colony on Mars, it may be too late.â€


